J 
August 3d, 1?23 
My dear Mr. Powell* 
I have very little to report, but the fol¬ 
lowing notes may be of interests 
299* Epidtn&rum sp. I am not satisfied with 
the specimen. 1 suspect that it is undersized. She flower ex¬ 
amined with a lens without boiling* suggests very strdmgly E, 
anceps Jaeq. 
298. Shis would seem to be a form of Epi- 
dendrum difxonae J ucq. I am still uncertain in my mind as to the 
proper treatment of this group, I have the same thing or what 
sosms to be the same, from Guatemala. 
249 Epidendrum latibabre Liudl. 
otelia cascajalensis Arnes. Cf. Sched* 
Orch 3. Shis ^termination is probably correct 
t the two flowers in a bottle to guide : 
Of course I 
sy mind. 
only had 
315 Habenaria bieornio Lindl. I have the same 
thfcig fron Pittler collected la Panama. -Oh is speoies m origin- 
ally collected In the ffurt Indies. Of. toes OrohiOaoeae face. 
IV. If you try to run this down ia the key l.o. you will find 
that it cones out very easily, it lB surely deliahtful t0 We 
alcoholic material of this. We con mke on accurate feawiag at 
last. 
Is worth its m j£ t “ 00tl011 ° ’“ t «rial of Stalls ouscajulent 
floral parte in their mtur'i^ ^ ^ er<rtlf3rln e to «oa the 
“ condition. 
'fours with beet wi 8h8B , 
