NORTH EASTON, MASS. July, 28th, 1921. 
My d e ar Dr. 8 c h 1 e o h t y r : 
I have just, finished a review of our corres¬ 
pondence for the years 1929 and 1921 to date for t,h« purpose of as¬ 
certaining' i n f or m at i s n regarding utters that might, have been over¬ 
looked under pressure of ot.her business. As might, be expected 1 have 
learned tjh at, several requests made by you have been neglected . I also 
r ht«*> v '*' t 
learned that, y-e-u — w-e-r-e equally culpable, perhaps more so, if one ne* 
g'lect.yf the fact, that my request shave, perhaps, been more numerous than 
yours. 
To begin : You have net) yet, forwarded to me t h e jl Is t, of Lehmann num¬ 
ber's referred to at. different) times as in progress. And this brings me 
to a question: What have you done with 8 Pleurot,hall is-like specimen 
from Colombia, Lehmann 6929 . I would welo&mc information relative to 
this. Then again I asked for a tracing' of Habe nar i a A m e s 1 a n a fro* 
Central America and analyses of t,he new Habe nar 1 as from Central America 
that, you described in your welcome contribution to the orchidology of 
that region. In your letter of September 29 th, 1920 I find a reference 
t o some StjO. Domingo orchids t ,h «t sere being 1 reserved for me at t,h® Berlin 
Museum. What, news are you feble to give me about, these? Then there is that 
Oneidiu* from Florida! Do you suppose Fraenzlin has touched this in his 
monograph for t,he Pflansenreich, a work now in t,h« press according' to a 
letter from him just received? I have already referred to the fact, that, 
you had not, sent, me a list of t,he numbers, wit,h determinations, of the 
Wilson Chinese orchids. The specimens themselves are here, as I have al¬ 
ready informed you. In sorting these out and comparing the numbers with 
my lists of loaned material I find that Henry 11,102 (Hb . Ames 1 Of, 7^8) is 
missing'. Perhaps this sheet, was overlooked. If you find it please send it 
t,o me when you have occasion to forward another set, of duplicates. Now I 
come t,0 a seconff species of Nabaluia that, you referred to and of which 1 
desire a tracing'. In my letter of January 31 1 1921 1 took up the matte 1, °f 
w 
Orchis. Owing' t,o t,h® war my files have been sliced to grow incomplete. I 
hoped you would help me restore my set) t .0 a condition approaching com — 
plet.ness. Then t.here were t,h® mi xsing' r^pj^ints of » hich I gave you a list,. 
The Pie urothal1 is fro* British Guiaj 
P. Hitohoockii. 
interests me. I am oalling it, 
x* lateral lobe 
v- posterior lobe. 
FETAL LIP 
On February 18th, 1921, in a letter of tfta't, date I Bent, you for your herb¬ 
arium a little Bornean Oberonia with t,he request that, you authenticate it. 
Did you receive this? I think it w&b 0. neglects Sohltjr . 
