
          like recta in shape of leaflets, & serratures, but pinnate,
& very softly downy. I have not your plant at all. 
"Xylosteum solonis." Seems most near X. ciliatum of Pursh.
"Polygonum mite Pers. [Persoon?] & Pursh." New to me. 
"Carex virescens." Extremely acceptable. There is in Herb. Linn.
a specimen from Germany, pinned to C. globularis (which it
scarcely can be) very near this plant of yours in the capsule,
but not the same. 
"C. pedunculata [Carex pedunculata]." New to me, & very acceptable. Pursh has 
"spicis ramosissimis" for remotissimis!!
"C. subulata Michx. [Carex subulata Michaux]." Also new to me. 
"C. broad leaved, wch. [which] grows in cedar swamps, is folliculata [Carex folliculata] of
Herb. Linn. found by Kalm. Pursh speaks of folliculata as very common.
"Leersia virginica." New to me.
"Agrostis diffusa Muhlg. [Muhlenberg]." appears to be, as the author
says, not distinct from his own tenuiflora, which I have.
"Festuca polystrachya Michx., procumbens Muhl."  I have nothing like it. 
"Gratiola neglecta" is precisely the authentic G. virginiana 
from Kalm. The synonym of Hort. Malab. [Hortus Malabaricus] belongs to a different 
plant, considered by Vahl as a vary. [variety] of G. trifida, but I think 
it still more unlike that species. 
"Apocynum cannabinum." Not so, but androsaemifolium.
"Arum virginicum." Right, by Kalm's specimen.
"Heliopsis laevis" exists in the Linnn. [Linnaean] herbarium under
the names of Buphthalmm. helianthoides [Buphthalmum helianthoides], Helianthus laevis,
Rudbeckia oppositifolia, and Silphium solidaginoides,
as quoted by Pursh, so that this species is a botanical
quaternity in Linnaeus. In excuse for him, I must 
remark, that 2 of the specimens are very bad, sent him 
dried, by different people, & look very difft. [different] from the others. 
"Carex disperma" is very near C. lobiaceae of Linns. [Linnaeus] & perhaps 
a variety, or starved plant. The fruit is almost precisely 
the same, but fewer together in your specns. [specimens]. 
"Osmunda spectabilis Willdw. [Willdenow]." I really think this is not
        