146 VETERINARY JURISPRUDENCE. 
Farquhar, William 
Ferris, John . 
Finzzies, James 
Fraser, Alexander 
Frater, William . 
Gibson, Alexander 
Gunn, Alexander . 
Hepburn, John 
Hutton, John 
Ironside, Jn. Matthew . 
Kay, Thomas 
Lawton, Peter 
Macintosh, Robert 
McLean, Lachlan 
Margarson, Edward 
Meiklam, Robert . 
Merry, Charles 
Millar, David 
Miller, William 
Mitchell, Robert . 
Nimmo, Andrew . 
McEwen, John 
Perry, Edward 
Philp, George 
Reid, Robert 
Schofield, John 
Seed, Samuel 
Simon, John . 
Smith, William 
Summers, Wm. 
Tait, George 
Tait, Joseph . 
Tallontire, John . 
Wright, William . 
Young, John . 
Shawstonhead, Ayrshire 
* • 
. 1848 
Brechin, S. Wales 
• • 
. 1856 
Lochgilly, Fifeshire . 
• • 
. 1860 
Earlsfield, Kennethmont, Aberdeenshire 1856 
Lesmahague, Lanarkshire 
• © 
. 1864 
Millbre, Fyvie, Aberdeen 
• • 
. 1868 
Balloan, Beauly, Invernesshire . 
. 1875 
Milnathort, Kinrosshire 
• • 
. 1850 
Kelso, Roxburghshire 
•• • 
. 1874 
Milltown, Rothiemay . 
• • 
. 1872 
Ardwick Green, Manchester 
. 1871 
Alderley, Chelford 
• • 
. 1862 
Falkirk 
• • 
. 1855 
Brooklyn, U.S. . 
• • 
. 1854 
Stoke Ferry, Norfolk . 
• • 
. 1874 
Drumry, E., Kilpatrick 
• e 
. 1866 
Irvine 
• • 
. 1863 
Alyth, Perthshire 
• • 
. 1877 
Bradninch, Collumpton, Devon . 
. 1853 
Glasgow . . , 
• • 
. 1859 
Linlithgow 
• # 
. 1850 
Killin, Perthshire 
• • 
. 1867 
Ibstock, Leicestershire 
• • 
. 1865 
St. Andrew’s, Fife 
• • 
. 1872 
Leith, Edinburgh 
J • 
, 1860 
Pontefract . 
• • 
, 1857 
Keighley 
• • 
. 1875 
Forgue by Huntley 
• • 
. 1866 
Tranent, Haddingtonshire 
• • 
. 1852 
Sidmouth, Devon 
• • 
. 1866 
Elgin .... 
• • 
. 1848 
Turriff 
• • 
. 1861 
Skelton, Cumberland . 
• • 
. 1863 
Tideswell, Derbyshire 
• • 
. 1857 
East Calder 
• • 
. 1870 
Veterinary Jurisprudence. 
SHEEP ROT. 
Winter Assizes, Maidstone, January 14th. 
Nisi Prius Court. —(Before Mr. Justice Denman.) 
LUDGATER V. LOVE. 
This case, which was tried at the last Assizes here, and in which a 
new trial had been ordered, was one of some interest. It was an action 
on a sale of sheep in Maidstone market, which were alleged to have 
been sold on a representation by the defendant that they were “ all 
right,” whereas in truth they were rotten and diseased, having a diseaae 
called the “ fluke.” 
Mr. F. J. Smith (with Mr. Kempe, Q.C.) was for the plaintiff; Mr. 
D. Kingsford was for the defendant. 
It appeared from the evidence that the sheep—22 in number—had 
been bought by Mr. Love, the defendant, towards the end of 1878 
(about a month before the sale to the plaintiff) at Ashford market for 
one Leeny, and had been sent to Leeny, at Wateringbury. A few days 
