49 
interpreted us r mat? of tbs- ant rior |fo«p, ard a paroophoron, 
consisting of a few tubul«n? at tfcs posterior end of the jtsCnad. 
In ?»#-. 
•he condition pereUels that it; ftttalos tip to S.* on. (lig, 14 ) 
where the esaonsphros &.jpoar*> larger in diasatar, but not longer, than 
in th f.anaie, /it b.i «S* (Fig* 21) it is longer and the cranial 
group of tubules has not degenerate*' as -men as in the festalo while 
tiia caudal grestip ha*. A© it* *nt«ricr -art ic larger ia diaseter, 
tl)Ki ia the fttsala* B1 diffo---o-.ee etc wore mx at ?.h «b v 
(IS > ) tai« K& , C * . (fig* IF)# a aal# has it leas do e r.? * e.; 
iricr *nd than a 9*0 an* fitale (Fig* 8), bet Jsat as such 
in tbs caudal group, £i 17,0 Con, (Fig, lb) tfc# art rirf or cranial 
group cf tubal $ s rsuai-s 4 i foir-a part .? the apididy-is corona© ting 
the rcte.it' tia directly to tho iolffian duct, bat ih ? caudal group 
has deteriorated ani glcaerdi arc found only an rudiments in the 
paredidyai or orpin o* .iraldo* ^ad in •* ductus: ahwos. Dcctuli 
efferents# are forcing a connection of be Wolffian duct with tfco 
rote tubule# of ihs tostia, but the glomeruli of ther,e cranial *»so- 
n/rphric tubules arc gone. At F0,0 -.tsu (Fi#, 29) this connection of 
the duotuli efferent#* from *olffiaa duct to ret# teatia io plnin 
and easily traced, £ucfa connection v *a? lost in the ftsftlo, wher^ 
the Foil led out to lb * d I group of 
aeacnaphri© tubttlos bs: forced a paradidymis, an a dueto* aberrere 
8**,c n : a off 1 self in th* HiWlir y with three email er»Jarf#W atI 
or. it- tubule/; i * dK.oc rate loner^Ii. Th# w-ol: -•■ -toner*)!*? ie 
slower t a . : r.cratt in the nal# than in th 1 ffcmrift* especially In 
th# later atftgos. 
In tbs free- art n: ** 
In the 9.9 on. ftee-eartia So, 1 (Fig, £0) tfeo aL-eonephro* i# 
larger than in th# fe ale of the auso ai&e. Ih> caudal group of 
tubules are degenerating a littl# ©or# slowly th* in the fecal*. 
