«Q. 
(3) The long narrow prostctio portion of the urethra i-*. the sals 
as coot rat; tod with the wide short vstibule i the female. 
(4) The difference ir. type of the bulto-arathral glands in nalee 
fre* that tf the bulbo-veatibul nr * in fb© feaale, their hosologuss. 
(&) The development in the sale of profuse prestaios, eurrouniing 
th© prc-.tatic urethra from the fcolho-urethral gland region to the open- 
irua of the folffian iucte, and spreading in a pentero-anterior direc¬ 
tion* they &p mr firnt at 5.1 or-. to, . The para-urethral duct#? of 
ti»e female, givon fey ^©ugebauor a ♦be horolcguoit of the prostates# do 
net appear in fecal os before th t P 0.0 os. stage, when two or throe 
<*p ear in the dorso-lati/ral groovaa of th vestibule, near the vagina 
Opening, not near the bulbo-vealibular gl&ndn an in -ales. 
(6) The absence in th • n&le of & hocolo/ue for the sub-urethral 
diverticulum of the ftormle, and the failure of its urethra to narrow 
in fr :nt of the folffian luot openings a - in females. 
(?) The short urethra proper 1 r the male as contrasted with one 
twice as Ion or sore# in the fe*ale. 
(8) The great development of the long corpus cavernoue urethrae 
in the a,la# with it: aignoid flexure# a- coatr-cted with its alrost 
* 
rudi?>ontary condiiior as the corpu c&varaosuR clitoridii: of the fe¬ 
male. abort and ainocat. 
(9) The opening of the Wolf ien ducts separately anterior to the 
vagina masculine in th? ta 1©, ac contrasted with their union with the 
vagina before opening &s one to the vo tibule in the fir ala. 
In all thi? above features, er.oopt th© last, th© freo»nertir» is 
definitely and ««ai©tafcably female as far as shown by the specimens 
studied. he etructcree mentioned in (9) above are of aoeoderml 
origin, which say in a aeaour© account for their being influenced in 
the sale direction, while the rest o* th© alaufi derivatives, oac *pt 
the strip between the ureters and the olffian ducts oo iiiu uorsal 
