514 
SOCIETY MEETINGS. 
Dr. Leonard Pearson ; Colnmbia University, Dr. D. E. Salmon ; 
Kansas City Veterinary College, Dr. S. Stewart; McKillip Vet¬ 
erinary College, Dr. F. S. Selioenleber; Cornell University, Dr. 
James Law ; Iowa Agrienltural College, Dr. M. Stalker ; United 
States Veterinary College, Dr. C. B. Robinson ; Ontario Veter¬ 
inary College, Dr. D. K. Smith ; Chieago Veterinary College, 
Dr. A. H. Baker. 
Drs. Hoskins, MeKillip, Clement and Parker were also pres¬ 
ent, the last two being invited to be present as representing Me- 
Gill University, nnoffieially. 
On motion of Dr. Stewart, seeonded by Dr. Baker, the minutes 
of the last meeting were approved as read. 
The Exeentive Committee reported favorably on the appli- 
eation of Dr. R. R. Bell, American Veterinary College; Dr. 
Greiner, Indianapolis Veterinary College ; Dr. Smith, Jr., of On¬ 
tario Veterinary College, and Dr. F. S. Selioenleber, McKillip 
Veterinary College. Drs. Clement and Parker not being eligi¬ 
ble to represent McGill University (not of the faculty or teach¬ 
ing staff) were reported unfavorably. On motion of Dr. Baker, 
seconded by Dr. Stewart, those representing other schools, but 
not eligible to vote, were invited to attend the meeting during 
reading of papers and the discussion of the same. 
Report of Cornnittee on Uniform Standard of Entrance Ex¬ 
amination —(Drs. D. E. Salmon and James Law).—Dr. Salmon 
reported that he had no report on the subject, but that Dr. Law 
had. Dr. Law read his report and it was discussed at length 
by every member present, and the discussion waxed so warm 
that Dr. Law protested to the very pointed and personal re¬ 
marks of Dr. Robinson, who was repeatedly called to order. 
When asked if the report of Dr. Law expressed the ideas of the 
whole committee, Dr. Salmon answered the chair that it did not, 
and that he would present one at the next meeting. On motion. 
Dr. Law’s report was accepted after it had been explained that 
acceptance does not ii«ply an endorsement of the views ex¬ 
pressed. On motion, further discussion was postponed till after 
the reading of Dr. Hoskins’ paper on ‘‘ Uniformity of State Reg¬ 
ulations Governing the Practice of Veterinary Medicine.” Both 
papers were freely discussed ; the prevailing opinion seemed to 
be for uniform entrance examination. On motion. Dr. Hoskins’^ 
paper was accepted. 
On motion of Dr. Osgood, seconded by Dr. Selioenleber, that 
a committee of five (5) be appointed to report at the next meet¬ 
ing on the advisability of forming a “ National Examining 
