CARRYING RANGE STEERS THROUGH THE WINTER 
5 
In discussing the table, we will first take up this question: 
If you expect to feed steers out at tzvo years of age , does it pay to 
winter feed them either as calves or as yearlingsf 
The steers fed during the third winter only—the winter during 
which they were fitted for market—gained 235 pounds per head and 
weighed 1146 pounds, while those fed the second and third winters, 
gained 361 pounds the third winter and weighed 1407 pounds. The 
latter not only weighed 261 pounds per head more because of their 
previous feeding, but were in better shape to pivt on good gains the 
winter they were finished out, putting on 126 pounds per head more 
weight than the steers fed the third winter only. Another point in 
their favor was that the extra weight was in fat rather than in 
frame, as they were valued at the close of the third winter, when 
ready for market, at $6.20 per cwt, while the steers fed the third 
winter only, were valued at $5.75 per cwt. These valuations were 
made by Mr. Henry Gebhardt, of Denver, without knowledge of 
what lots the steers were from. 
Mr. Gebhardt, at the same time, placed a valuation of $6.10 
upon the steers brought in to the College in the fall of 1905 and fed 
all three winters. These steers made a gain of only 223 pounds per 
head the third winter,—less than either of the other lots; and they 
showed an average weight of 1368 pounds per head, or 39 pounds 
per head less than the steers that were not winter fed as calves, and 
222 pounds per head more than the steers that were not winter fed 
either as calves or yearlings. These results plainly show that winter 
feeding the calves was not profitable when the steers were to be 
held over to be finished off as two-year-olds, for the lot that were 
not winter fed as calves, but were fed the two succeeding wdnters, not 
only made the largest gain during the last winter, but showed the 
heaviest average weight, and were in best market condition. 
We can state then, so far as the gains made by these steers 
are concerned, that when the aim in view was to finish the steers 
as two-year-olds, the feed put into them as calves was wasted, but 
feeding them the winter they were yearlings put them in shape to 
make better gains the next winter and made better market steers of 
them. This result does not coincide with the view of those cattle¬ 
men, who believe that if only one winter’s feed is to be given previous 
to the winter of finishing, that feed should be given the calves in 
order to retain upon them their baby flesh. But a study of the weights 
and gains of the steers brought in as calves will bring out the reason. 
I believe, for the poor showing made by these steers the third winter. 
