BY DR. J. L. HANCOCK. 
51 
the new genus Rostella, Hanc., two species are represented, 
namely, R. phyllocerum, He Hann, and R. processus, Han¬ 
cock.* 
Genus Rhopalotarsus, Hancock. 
Hancock, Trans. Ent. Soc. Lond. p. 356, 1910. 
R. clavipes, Hancock. 
Hancock, Trans. Ent. Soc. Lond. p. 858, 1910. 
One example from Kuching, Aug. 15, 1899. 
In the original description of this species there occurred 
a typographical error in giving the length of the body of 
the female as 21 # 2 mm. instead of 16*2 mm. The type 
from Sumatra does not differ from the Bornean example. 
Genus Euparatettix, Hancock. 
Hancock, Spol. Zeylan. ii. p. 145, 1904; Gen. Ins. 
Orthopt., Acrid. Tetr. p. 55, 1906. 
E. similis, Hanc. 
Hancock, Trans. Ent. Soc. Lond. p. 238, 1907. 
One example, Lundu, June 1904. Sarawak Museum. 
This species resembles E. personatus , Boh, the frontal 
costa being roundly produced beyond the eyes ; the antennae 
rather long and inserted between the lower angles of the 
eyes ; the paired ocelli placed between the middle of the 
eyes; posterior femora having the tibiae black, with one or 
two light annulations; the third pulvilli of posterior tarsi 
little longer than the first and second, the first and second 
being spinose. 
E. erassipes, Hancock, sp. nov., MS.t 
Three examples, Kuching. Sarawak Museum. 
I have recently described this new species from Indian 
examples, the manuscript now being in the course of 
publication. The three Bornean specimens from the 
Sarawak Museum do not differ materially from the Indian 
type material. 
* Kirby gives the name Miriatra in his Syn. Cat. of Orthopt. iii. p. 29, to 
replace my Mitritettix, but his name can hardly stand in the face of my 
previously proposed name as indicated above. 
f Since described in ‘ Memoirs Dept, of Agriculture in India,’ vol. iv. 
No. 2, pp. 158-154, 1912. 
E 2 
