Conception, the reprefentation in the 
mind when the objedl is abfent, 109; 
every thing abjent in Time and Space, 
that we think of only, but do not touch, 
ibid, the mental form which is abftradled 
from the objedl that ftrikes the fenfes, 
134 ; joined to Intuition conftitutes Know¬ 
ledge, ibid, without Intuition is empty, 
ib. obeys the laws of Underftanding, 
153; the original notion formed by the 
adtion of the Categories, 159 ; the image 
retained in the mind when the objedl is 
abfent, 163 ; compared with judgment, 
193 ; is a reprefentation which refers to 
many objedts, 230. 
Conditions in man that render knowledge 
poffible, 117. 
Conflict of Reafon with itfelf, 220 ; the 
intereft which Reafon takes in this con- 
flidl, ib. folution of this conflidt, 223 ; 
this conflidt entirely removed, 224. 
Confcience is the innate principle of our mo¬ 
ral exillence, 136 ; its fecret voice alone 
decides, 154; is the pradtical law of 
Reafon, 167 ; immediately tells man that 
he is a moral being, 175. 
Confcioufnefs, its definition till now defec¬ 
tive, ir9;4s a refledtive adt of the mind, 
161 ; teaches the belief in a Deity, 167 ; 
announces itfelf by I think, 193; divided 
into pure and empirical, 195 ; its analytic 
and fynthetic unity, ib. of our own exift- 
ence proves the exiftence of objedts in 
fpace, 204. 
Convidtion, a taking-for-true upon grounds 
that are objedtively fufticient, 249. 
Copernicus, his labours have rifen never 
again to fet, 120 ; his theory confidered 
a dangerous herefy, but now the boaft of 
reafon, 129; was thrown into prifon, ibid, 
fubftituted immutable truth for long-ftand- 
ing error, ib. the advantages of his Syf- 
tem pointed out, ib. accomplilhed a 
complete revolution in Natural Philofo- 
pby, 151. 
Cosmological Ideas: 
k, Quantity, the abfolute completenefs of 
the compcfttion of the phenomena. 
2. Quality, the abfolute completenefs of the 
divifton of the phenomena. 
3. Relation, the abfolute completenefs of 
the arijlng of the phenomena. 
4 * Modality, the abfolute completenefs of the 
exiftence of the phenomena, 215; 
they are the Categories extended to 
the infinite, 225; folution of thefe Ideas, 
ibid, are only regulative principles, and 
the error arifes in confidering them as 
conftitutive, ib. 
Cofmology, 173 ; founded upon the Idea of 
Abfolute Caufe, 153 ; the abfolute tota¬ 
lity of conditions of all the objedts in the 
world, 211. 
Critic of Judgment, by Kant, 154; has 
obtained the fuflrages of the decided ene¬ 
mies of Critical Philofophy, ibid, the 
fublime and beautiful belong to the Judg¬ 
ing faculty, ib. 
Critic of Practical Reason, by 
Kant, 154; explains the laws of Free 
Will, ib. 
tl Critic of Pure Reason,” contains a 
■Complete Analyfisof all the Mental Faculties , 
112; the foundation of Morals in d Reli¬ 
gion, 118 ; contains nothing but truth as 
well as Euclid, ib. contains an entirely new 
Science of which no one prior to Kant had 
conceived the thought, 119 ; a text-book in 
all the proteftantuniverfities in Germany, 
120 ; need only be ftudied in order to be 
completely underftood and finally adopted, 
Vot. XX. No. 1365. V 
PHILOSOPHY. 
120 ; no tranflator can do juftice to it that 
does not underlland the fyftem, 12 ij its 
inveftigation not produdlive of harm, but 
may be of much good, 122 ; the moft ce¬ 
lebrated of Kant’s metaphyfical works, 
124 ; is a book like the Elements of Eu¬ 
clid, 130 ; the extraordinary impreflion it 
has made in Germany, 137; feemed to 
be the produdtion ofaceleftial intelligence 
rather than of a man, 139 ; a moft inva¬ 
luable treafure, and contains a Complete 
analyfis of the Mental Powers, 142 ; and it 
alone comprifes the whole well-attefted 
plan by which Metapbyfics as a fcience 
can be produced, ib. whoever has once 
tailed the ‘ Critic' will never return to 
Dogmatifm, ib. muft be inveftigated, ib. 
contains the only true Philofophy of 
Mind, and leaves nothing further to be 
difcovered, 144 ; contains a fcience ne¬ 
ver before offered to man, that eradicates 
all the errors of Speculative Philofophy, 
ib. ranks with the labours of Euclid, Co¬ 
pernicus, Kepler, and Newton, ib. a text- 
book for the univerfities of Germany, ib. a 
produdtion of the human intelledl which 
difplays the greateft boldnefs, profundity, 
and independence, 153 ; its objedl is to 
eftablifh the fadt of Synthetical Judgments 
. a priori, upon which Transcendental 
Philosophy is eredled, 155 ; proves that 
all preceding fyftems are mere fophiftry, 
156; embraces two confiderations; 1. 
Eft he tics ; 2. Logic, 182; a long-dormant 
book, which is the pride and glory of Ger¬ 
many, ib. leads neceflarily to fcience, 
186; does not treat of the nature of the 
things, but merely of our faculties, ib. 
not a mere criticifm of books and fyftems, 
but a Critical examination of Pure Reafon 
itfelf, 187 ; it fervesto purify our Reason, 
and keep it free from error , ib. comprifes 
every thing that belongs to Franfcendental 
Philofophy, 187 ; only examines fynthetical 
knowledge a priori, ib. has refuted Spiri- 
tualifm only as a dogmatical Syftem, 214; 
juftifies the reference of Ideas to objedts, 
by fliowing that we may affume them con- 
tradidtions, 229; muft develope the true 
intention of Reafon in the ufe of its ideas, 
236 ; the Critic ihould be employed for 
academical inltrudtion, 244 ; has done that 
for knowledge which the mathematics has 
done for geography, ib. has explained 
Synthetical Judgments a priori, ib. is a fyf¬ 
tem of all philofophical knowledge of 
Pure Reafon, 251. 
Critic of Theology from fpeculative grounds, 
? 34 - 
Criticof Tafte, Hands inneed of Philofophy, 
177. 
Critical Idealiftn explained, 171; confiders 
the things as phenomena, ib. 
Critical Philofophy, different from all other, 
and produces a complete revolution in 
thinking, 169; infers from the neceffity 
of fome conceptions certain difpofitions of 
the Mind, 170 ; declares all philofophi- 
zing upon the things in themfelves to be 
vain, ib. 
Criticifm explained, 16S. 
Cudworth, flourilhed a hundred and fifty 
years ago, 125 ; difplays a rich (lore of 
choice erudition, ib. the great opponent 
of Hobbes, ib. his works tranflated into 
Latin by Dr. Mofheim, ib. his manufcripts 
in the Britifh Mufeum, 126; his work 
Immutable Morality, ib. fome Ideas arife 
from the mind, ib. his relative Ideas, 131; 
compared with Kant, ib. 
Culture, its objedl is to produce a readine/s. 
3 T 
253 
without deftroying that already acquired, 
241. 
Cunning egotift, is only enlightened with 
regard to his earthly advantages, 181. 
Dedudtion of the Categories of Underftand¬ 
ing, 115, 194. 
Definitions (26) which reply to all Stewart’s 
difficulties, 133 ; of Intuition, Conception, 
and Idea, 134; give the marks that we 
unite in one conception completely and 
precifely, 242. 
Degerando quoted on the fubjedl of the new 
Philofophy, 137 ; does not profefs com¬ 
pletely to underlland the fyftem, 138, 
did not apprehend the Categories in their 
purity, ib. has not evinced the fidelity of 
a tranflator, ib. unfit to play the part of a 
Critic, ib. 
Deift, admits a tranfcenJental theology, 234 ; 
while the Theift adopts a natural theology, 
ib. 
Demonftrations are apodidtical proofs in fo 
far as they are intuitive, 243 ; proofs by 
means of empirical intuitions are not demon¬ 
ftrations, neither are philofophical proofs, 
ib. 
De Mundi Senftbilis atque Intelligibilis forma et 
principiis, 1770. written by Kant in Latin 
as an inaugural diff'ertation when candidate 
for the metaphyfical chair, 140; the Critic 
of Pure Reafon not puhlilhed till eleven 
years afterwards, i. e, 1781, ib. difcufled 
in the univerfity of Kdnigfherg, 141 5 
Lambert’s opinion of this work, 142; com- 
pofed in hafte and under ficknefs, to ob¬ 
tain the univerfity chair, 144. 
Defcartes inveftigated the thinking being, 
and interrogated the Deity concerning 
knowledge, 151; his innate ideas, 153. 
Defideratum, in Science is a complete intellec¬ 
tual Chart, 131; difcovered by Kant, ib. 
a fcience that eradicates all the errors of 
Speculative Philofophy, and fliows the 
exadl number of the Elements of the Human 
Mind, 144. 
De Stael (Mad.), her work, entitled “ Ger¬ 
many,” explains the new German philo¬ 
fophy, 135; colledled her materials on 
the fpot, ib. influence of the new philofophy 
on the development of Mind, ib. not her 
intention to teach the fyftem, but to give 
a general view of it as a whole, ib. her 
note on the fubjedl of Kant’s philofophy, 
ib. her objedt to develope the great re- 
fults of this philofophy, ib. it is more fa¬ 
vourable to the extenfion of mind than 
any other, referring every thing to the 
focus of the Soul, ib. greatly affifted by 
A. W. Von Schlegel, 136 ; her extraor¬ 
dinary penetration qualified her to feize 
and delineate the outline of thefe new 
difcoveries, 136 ; the great popularity of 
her work on Germany, 137; travelled to 
tile birth-place of the new German philo¬ 
fophy, ib. exerted herfelf to extend its 
influence all over the world, ib. her admi¬ 
rable account of German literature, 159. 
Dialedtics, or the expofure of pretended 
knowledge, 208 j inveftigates whether 
we have not a peculiar kind of knowledge 
that refers a priori to objedls, 208 ; of 
Pure Reafon, 240. 
Dialedtic Conclufions of Pure Reafon, 2iz. 
1. Categoricalprofyllogifm, which explains 
the nature of the foul. 
2. Hypothetical profyllogifm, which explains 
the origin of the world. 
3. Disjunctive profyllogifm, which explains 
the nature of God. 
Difference between Juftice and Morality, 177; 
between pure and empirical knowledge* 
1831 
