PHILOSOPHY 
254 
i$3 ; between Thinking and Knowing, 
240. 
Difcipline of Pure Reafon, gives laws for 
a corredt ufe of Reafon, 240; it is indif- 
pjerifible prior to all DoBrine, 241 ; in its 
dogmatical ufe, 241 ; in its polemical ufe, 
243 ; in its hypothetical ufe , 245 ; with re¬ 
gard to its proofs, 246. 
Difpute about matter and mind finally difpofed 
,°f’ 1 34 - 
Divilion of Objedts into Phenomena and Nou- 
mena, 205. 
Do that which will render you worthy to 
be happy, 248. 
Do the powers of intelledf extend to things 
inaccellible to the fenfes ? 152. 
Dodlrinal Belief explained, 249. 
Do&rine of Rights, 173; private and pub¬ 
lic rights, ib. of bappinefs, 173. 
Dogmas and Mathemas explained, 243. 
Dogmatical Philosophy, its fallacy 
fully fhotvn, 110 ; arrived at the period 
of its final decay, 142. 
Dogmatifm explained, 168 ; pretends to 
know the things as they are in them- 
felves, 175 ; leads to Scepricifm, 186. 
Earth, its motion eftablilhed in our convic¬ 
tion, 169; its greater elevation at the 
equator explained by the centrifugal force, 
239. 
Edinburgh Encyclopedia quotes Mr. Stewart 
againft Kant, 143. 
Edinburgh Review for Jan. 1803, reviews 
Villers’s Philofophie de Kant, 123 ; does 
not afi'edt the ‘ Critic of Pure Reafon ,’ ib. 
Education, its efiential objetfs are, firft, to 
cultivate all the various principles of our 
nature; fecondly, to watch the early af- 
fociations and prevent error, 121 ; a con- 
feioufnefs of our defefts is the firft ftep 
towards improvement, ib. is a difcipline, 
173 ; requires a found knowledge of the 
philofophie fciences, 179; is the harmo¬ 
nious cultivation of all the fenfible, in- 
telleftual, and moral, powers, ib. 
Egotifm explained, 176. 
Elements of the Critical Philofophy publilhed 
by Dr. Willich, 124. 
Elements of the Human Mind exhibited at 
one view in a map, 113 ; their number 
completely determined, and nothing left 
to be difeovered, 144. 
“ Elements of the Human Mind” by D11- 
gald Stewart, does not contain a fyftem of 
the mind, 131; has no definition of the 
underftanding, 132; not a fugle menial 
Element fully difeuffed or firmly efta- 
blilhed, 144. 
Elements of Tranfcendental Philofophy, 
187-. 
“ Elucidation of Kant’s Critic of Pure Rea¬ 
fon,” by Johann Schultz, 155; in this 
work the new theory of Time and Space \$ 
made quite familiar, ib. 
Encyclopaedia Britannica contains the folu- 
tion of Mr. Dugald Stewart’s difficulty, 
159. 
Enlightened Edinburgh proves the poflibilitv 
of underftanding Kant’s works, 158. 
Enlightenment means found inftruftion ill 
all that is important to man, 179 ; phi¬ 
lofophy mull: beconfidered as the fource of 
true enlightenment, ib. of prudence, 
which eafily degenerates into moral depra¬ 
vity, 181 ; univerfal and complete, is that 
which embraces every .iutereft of man¬ 
kind, ib. in politics, ib. 
Epicurus is confidered as the chief of the 
fenfual philofophers, 251. 
Efiay on Perpetual Peace, by Kant, 155. 
Efthetics, fully accounts for the origin of 
the notions of ‘Time and Space, and deve- 
lopestfie entire Senfttive Faculty, 112; the 
fcience of feeling, including that of the 
Sublime and Beautiful, 167 ; the doc¬ 
trine of Tafte, 173; Ihows what faculties of 
the mind are employed in judging, ib. de¬ 
termines the aim of thefine arts, ib. is as 
certain and indubitable as can be required 
of any theory, 19 I. 
Ethics is applied to Moral Philofophy, 173. 
“ Every Event muft have a Caufe,” no¬ 
thing can overturn this truth, 169. 
Examination of Nature, 127. 
Exception to the rule, What Is eafy in theory 
is difficult in praBlce, 118. 
Experience would be nothing but a chaos 
without the laws of Underfunding, the 
Categories, 136 ; can never offer 
more than conditional certainty, 130 ; 
teaches us that things are conftituted in a 
certain manner, but never that they can¬ 
not be otherwife, 183 ; whence does it de¬ 
rive its certainty, ib. internal could not 
be polfible but for external, 205. 
Experimental Knowledge, that in which the 
matter only is given from without, the 
form is produced by the Mind, no; its 
common nature explained, 118. 
External Intuition, all the objedts of na¬ 
ture, 127 ; acquaints us with the exiftence 
of things in Space, 128; refolved into feil- 
fations, ib. alfo called phenomena, ib. 
External Senfe receives a variety that co- 
exifts, 127 ; occafions us to reprefent ob¬ 
jects in Space, 187. 
External World fecured to us by Tranfcen¬ 
dental Philofophy, 128; and the matter 
of which it is' cctnpofed fully accounted 
for, ib. 
Fancy of innate ideas, 159. 
Feeling confidered in its connexions with 
the reprefenting and defiring faculty, 167. 
Fichte, turns afide from Kant’s path, 133 ; 
was not content with the fubjeBive reality, 
ib. rejedts the idea of fomething given, 
171. 
Fine Arts explained, 136. 
Form muft be produced by the mind, 113; 
in which all objedls appear to us deter¬ 
mined by the mind, but the matter does 
not fpring from the lame fource, it mull: 
be given, 170. 
Formularies of Philofophy. 1, In mundo 
non datur ftaltus ; 2, non datur hiatus ; 3, 
non datur cafuspurus ; 4, non datur fatum, 
205. 
Frederic king of Pruffia, threatened Kant 
with banilhment, 129. 
Freedom of the Will, eftablilhed for ever, 
in; is PraBical Reafon, 139 ; manifefts 
itfelf in the moral law, 214 ; proved not 
to be inconfiftent with the Necejftty of Na¬ 
ture, 227. 
Freedom is a power to begin a ftate of itfelf, 
226. 
French, a language well adapted to convey 
the New German Syflem in a clear and con- 
cife manner, 138. 
Galileo, a commentator on the labours of 
Copernicus, 129. 
“ Gelehrte Zeitung" of Gotha, in No. 12, 
fays, every experienced thinker may, 
without extraordinary exertion, make 
himfelf acquainted with the genuine mean¬ 
ing of the ‘ Critic,’ 157. 
General Contents of Philofophy, 164. 
General Remarks on the Syflem of Principles, 
204. 
Geometry, adlual, pulled down and deftroyed 
by externally-exerting Space, 132; the 
certainty of its propofitions depend upon 
pure Space, 153 ; its pofitions are all fyn- 
thetical and a priori, 183, 191. 
“ Germ ANY,” a celebrated work by Mad. 
de Stael, J 3 5; through this work the 
Englifh reader has been made acquainted 
with German metaphyfics, ib- difplays 
the great refults of Kant’s fyftem, 136. 
GlofTary of Kant’s new terms, 124. 
God does not exift in Time and Space, 134 ; 
inacceffible to fpeculative objections, 152 ; 
the abfolute necelfity of his exiftence 
proved, 154; his omnifcience and omni¬ 
potence, 154, 248; the Creator, Prefer- 
ver, and Governor, both of the Phyfcal and 
Moral world, 167 ; a Being independent of 
Nature, but who conftrudted the univerfe, 
173 ; muft be the Author of Nature, but 
yet out of Nature, 248. 
Good and Evil, 169 ; are principles of Rea¬ 
fon, 172. 
Government, its nature inveftigated, 153 ; 
revolutionary maxims cannot be juftified, 
ib. remarks on the death of Louis XVI, 
ib. 
Gravity, its properties firft difeovered at the 
furface of the earth, 237 ; an efiential pro¬ 
perty of matter, ib. 
Happinefs is the fum of all fubjedlive ends, 
247 ; to this end all our hopes tend, 248 ; 
its connexion with morality, ib. alone is 
not the highef good, nor is virtue alone, 
ib. 
Herlchel confirmed the Theory of Coperni¬ 
cus, 129. 
Higheft Good is the aim of all rational exer¬ 
tion, 169. 
Hiftory cannot difpenfe with Philofophy, 
178; Hiftory of Pure Reafon deferibes the 
tftbrts of Rejfon that have hitherto taken 
place, 231. 
How can we difeover the common properties 
of knowledge ? 118. 
How are the imprefiions which we receive 
from without converted into real and 
fubftantial knowledge ? 132. 
How is pure Mathematics polfible ? 185. 
How are Metaphyfics as a Science polfible ? 
186. 
How is pure Natural Philofophy polfible? 
'85* 
How are Synthetical Judgments a priori poffihle? 
150, 185 ; it required the entire Critic 
of Pure Reason to folve this queftion, 
150; completely folved in Tranfcendental 
Eft he tics, 193. 
Human Mind, confiftsof three primitive and 
original Faculties, Reason, Under¬ 
standing, and Sense, 127. 
Human Wifdom is for ever humbled by 
Kant’s Philofophy, 160. 
Hume, David, his doubts concerning Caufe 
and EffeB, 115; had involved himfelf in 
dilemma, ib. fuppofed the notion of Caufe 
and Effedl was derived from experience, 
ib. ftruck the firft fpark that led to the 
New Philofophy, 120; firft roufed Kant 
from his dogmatical llumbers, 126; chal¬ 
lenges Reafon to account for the notion of 
Caufe and EffieB, ib. failed in the folution 
of his problem, and became a confirmed 
Sceptic, ib. unable to fatisfy himfelf, 
abandoned his fyftem in defpair, 133; his 
replies to the Englilh philofophers, ib. his 
antagonifts did not perceive his drift, ib. 
his fpeculations contain the Germ of the 
New Syflem, ib. reafoning replies to Stew¬ 
art’s difficulties, ib. no adverfary of Kant, 
139 ; roufed Kant from his dogmatical 
llumbers, ib. his principle of Caufality, 
149 ; tends to deftroy the Axiom, Eatery 
Event has a Caufe, ib, inftead of explaining 
