fundamental conceptions, ib. furpaffed by 
Philofophy, 174; a fcience that has no 
regard to objedts, 221; error cannot here 
remain hidden, 241; reprefents the uni- 
verfal in the particular, 242 ; its certainty 
always intuitive, 243. 
Matter is Senfation, in ; muft be given to 
the mind, 113; in nature is either in 
Extenfton or Succeffton, 127; not created by 
the mind, 128 ; confifts of the impreffions 
which the objedts make upon us, 152. 
Medicine greatly improved by Philofophy, 
177 - 
Memory cannot be defined by Mr. Dugald 
Stewart, 133. 
Mendelsihon (Mofes), maintained, that, 
though the fimplicity of the Soul prevented 
its being deltroyed by divifion, yet it might 
evanefce, and thus ceafe to exift, 213. 
Mental Elements , Time and Space, are two 
receptacles, and contain all tile matter 
given to the Mind, r 10 ; are definite, and 
can neither be augmented nor diminifhed, 
118. 
Mental Faculties put into play by fomething 
given to the mind, no; are objedts of 
confcioufnefs, 117; have their forms and 
laws to which they are reftridled, 152. 
Metaphyfical Elementsof Law and Ethics by 
Kant, 149; Metaphyfical Principles of 
Natural Philofophy, by Kant, 154; Me¬ 
taphyfical Elements ot Riglit, by Kant, 
154; treats of Policy and Legiflature, 
155 - 
Metaphysics, a pure rational fcience, 
divifible into Metaphysics op Na¬ 
ture and Metaphysics of Morals; 
the former confift of Ontology and Coftndogy, 
the latter ot Pfychology and Theology, 109 ; 
no fcience of Metaphyfics prior to Kant, 
115 ; the Science which treats of exigences in- 
accejjille to the Senfes, 116 ; a phenomenon 
of 18th century, 124; contemplates objedts 
that can never come into Time and Space, 
130 ; it will require a new generation to 
walh away the prejudices of early educa¬ 
tion, before it can be felt, 144; is divided 
into Ontology, Pfychology, Col'mology, 
and Theology, 151 ; is a fcience which 
cannot be difpenfed with, ib. as long as 
Reafon lafts we (hall always have Metaphy¬ 
fics, ib. not a dull and heavy ftudy, 155 ; 
is the lcience cf that which is inaccefiible 
to the Senfes, 172 ; of Nature and of 
Morals, ib. of Morals explained, 173; 
its ultimate objedt is the l'olution of the 
problems of Reafon, God, Liberty, and 
immortality, 183 ; confifts of nothing 
but fynthetical pofitions d priori, 185 ; will 
laft for ever ! 186. 
Mind is adted upon by fomething that does 
not create, 128 ; this adtive caule is termed 
Noumenon, ib. muft have a Receptivity, ib. 
as it does not create the matter, it muft be 
given, ib. gives a form to this matter, ib. 
influenced by the reigning Philofophy of a 
Country, 136 ; its laws aie the laws of 
Nature, 151 ; and Matter, this difpute 
finally ended, 133 ; does not create matter, 
159; is both attive and pajftve in the ac- 
quilition of knowledge, id. can never free 
itfelf from its univerfal concitions, 170 ; 
when itsconditions are annulled,the objedls 
muft alfo difappear, 191 ; confifts of Re¬ 
ceptivity and Spontaneity, 193. 
Morality explained, 130. 
Monument of truth eftablilhed in the Brililh 
Dominions, the Principles ot “Trans¬ 
cendental Philosophy,” 162. 
Moral Law, the, announces itfelf in the 
Soul of every individual, 175; not the 
Vol. XX. No. 13C5. 
PHILOSOPHY. 
eft’edtof education, habit, &c.ib. is certain 
a priori, 234; revealed to man by his 
Reafon, 154 ; does not arife from expe¬ 
rience, 170 ; is an objedlive Law, and 
valid for every body, 247; leads to the 
Idea of God, 249. 
Morality eftablilhed upon the bafis of 
ever-during Truth, no; indebted to Plli- 
lofophy for its development, 174; quite 
independent of our inllindl for happinefs, 
1755 is grounded in Reafon alone, ib. its 
jftridl laws derived from Prabhcal Reafon, 
176 ; confifts in a diiinterefted obedience 
to the univerlal precepts of Reafon, ib. 
Natural Philofophy explains the objedts of 
External Senje, 173 ; an immenfe field is 
here open for future inveftigation, ib. 
contains Synthetical Judgments d priori, 
185. 
Natural and pofitive Rights, 177. 
Natural Theology explained, 234. 
Nature, its objedts accounted lor, 128 ; its 
beautiful harmony not intheleaft difturbed 
by Kant’s Theory, 129 ; is only a collec¬ 
tion of Phenomena, 136; completely ar¬ 
ranged under the words prefent and abjent, 
134. 
Necefiity and Contingency explained, 169. 
New Terms were forced to be coined to 
defignate Nevj Phenomena, 119. 
Newton threw great light on the Theory of 
Copernicus, 129 ; his Principia much con¬ 
troverted on its iirft appearance, but now 
univerfally adopted, 139; his principles 
compered with thofe of Kant, 140; his 
principles deviated from all prior phyfics, 
though now univerfally adopted, 148 ; 
the inventor of the fyftem of attraflion, 
> 5 *- . ... 
Nitlch (Frederick Augu ftus), the immediate 
difciple of ProfefTor Kant, 112; gave 
ledlores in London in 1795. ib. in 1796 
publilhed his General and Introductory View 
of Kant's Principles, 113; his toi Princi¬ 
ples comprife the efifer.ce of the Critic, 
ib. his Principle VII. dales that the 
matter muft be given, and the form produ¬ 
ced, ib. ftrongly recommends a a tranfla- 
tion of the Critic, 1 14; his account of 
Kant’s inveftigation of the Senftive Fa¬ 
culty, 115 ; dates the diffenfions of Philo- 
fophers, 116; oppofite opinions regarding 
Senje, Underfunding, ami Reafon, prove 
that we have no Philofophy of Mind, ib. 
his criterion of what is knowable, ib. the 
anfvver to what is knowable muft be uni- 
verfal and true, ib. his mode of difeover- 
ing the true niture of the Knowing 
Faculty, 118; an exception to the rule 
of What is eafy in theory is difficult inpra&ice, 
ib. his account of the Faculties of Rea¬ 
son, Understanding, and Sense, ib. 
his principles ; No. 1 dates, that fetting 
out with what is univerfally granted, 
compels afient to what follows; No. 2 
Hates, that every body is confeious of a 
thinking faculty; No. 3 afierts that, in 
order to explain the Knowing Faculty, it is 
liecefl'ary to analyze knowledge, Ii8; 
whoever agrees to thefe is compelled to 
admit the remaining 98, which are 
entirely new, ib.' they have a great in¬ 
fluence on our moral condudl, ib. when 
thefe principles take root, virtue will 
llourifti, ib. has difplayed in the cleared 
manner a perfefi analyfis of the mind, 119 ; 
defined the notions ot Time and Space , ib. 
his principles give an accurate definition 
of Judgment and a complete account of 
the Categories, ib. they (how that man 
forms an Idea of God by Reafon, ib. has 
3 U 
257 
performed an Herculean talk in develop¬ 
ing fo much important knowledge in 101 
Principles, ib. dates that all that man can 
know are the objeCls in Time and Space, 
and the conditions in the mind which render 
fuch knowledgepoffible, ib. his treatife is a 
fterling work, and will vie with Euclid, 
ib. has thrown a powerful light on Kant’s 
fyftem, 129 ; his Principle VII. can never 
be refuted, 130; vindicated from the 
charge of not having underltood the fyf¬ 
tem, 137 ; a learned and excellent man, 
who folicited in vain the attention of the 
Britifh public to Kant’s Philofophy, 160 ; 
the immediate difciple of the founder of 
true Philofophy, ib. 
Nothing divided according to the Catego¬ 
ries, 205. 
1. Quantity — is an empty conception. 
2. tjaality— is an empty objebl. 
3. Relation— is an empty intuition. 
4. Modality— is an objebl without a concep¬ 
tion. 
Noumenon, fomething out of Time and Space, 
which is the caufe of the Phenomenon, 
128 ; the thing in itfelf independent of tiie 
mind, ib. in a pofitive and negative lenfe, 
205. 
Objedts can only be given to us by the uni¬ 
ted operation of Sense and Under¬ 
standing, no; are clothed in figures 
which are properties of the mind, 120; 
thofe of Nature accounted for, 128; of 
Nature minutely examined, ib. all that 
compofe tile world, are comprehended un¬ 
der the 12 Categories, ib. are only 
Phenomena, 130; when they affect our 
fenfes are termed Intuitions, 134; but, 
when they ceafe to operate, Conceptions, 
ib. out of Time and Space exemplified, ib. 
adapt themfelves to the faculties of the hu¬ 
man intellcdl, 151 ; the qualities we af- 
cribe to them belong to the mind itfelf, ib. 
all, muft be chilled under all the Catego - 
,ries at once, 133; in themfelves are Nou- 
mer.a, but as they merely appear to us are 
Phenomena, 138 ; our mode of perceiving 
we attribute to the objedls, ib. are nor ex¬ 
tended and figured bodies independent of the 
Mind, 159 ; are only known to us as they 
exift in the mind, 160; are nothing but 
mere reprefentations of Senfe, 103 ; are 
they the fame to everyone, and the fame 
as they appear to us ? 167; we determine 
them by our Knowing Faculty, 169 ; muft 
be reprefented as they are given to the 
mind, 170 ; we are adted upon by objeCls 
that are wholly unknown to us, and quite 
different from the phenomena, 171 ; are 
indeed known to us, human beings, merely 
as they appear, not as they are in tliem- 
felves, 175; when prefent, are Intuitions, 
187; are nothing but fenfible reprefenta¬ 
tions whofe form is Space, 189 ; may be 
confidered under two points of view, firft 
as objects in themfelves, fecondly as pheno¬ 
mena, 190; are not merely reprefentations, 
but are really exifting things, 204 ; but 
the EffeCls we aferibe to external things 
have their Caujes in us, ib. divided into 
Phenomena and Noumcna, 205. 
Obje6tive Unity explained, 128. 
Ontology, alfo called Transcendental 
Philosophy, 172. 
Opinion, a taking-for-true without fufficient 
grounds, 249. 
Oratory becomes more impreflive by a know¬ 
ledge of Philofophy, 178. 
Organon of Pure Reafon muft contain the 
principles of all pure knowledge d prion, 
] 80 . 
Original 
