Reason, a faculty which adb quite inde¬ 
pendently of Time and Space, and lifts 
man out of Nature, log 5 gives laws of 
Freedom to the Will, ib. diftinguilhes Man 
from all other created beings, ib. has the 
power to generate pure Knowledge a 
priori, no; this faculty diftinguifhcd 
from Sert/e and Underfand.ng, 114; a con¬ 
cluding faculty, ib. its compafs completely 
determined, 115; no longer the fport of 
prejudice and abfurdity, 122; an adtive 
faculty, free from Time and Space, divi- 
fible into Theoretical and Practical, 127; 
a Spontaneity free from Time and Space, 
which connects the Categories into 
Ideas, ib. the third and higheft Faculty of 
Man, 130; cannot be defined by Mr. 
Dugald Stewart, 133; divifible into Specu¬ 
lative and Practical, 138 ; muft renounce 
her imaginary conquefts, 152; trial at the 
tar of her own tribunal, ib. forms con- 
clufions, and is the third degree of Spon¬ 
taneity, ib. the pre-eminent diftindtion of 
man, 163 ; drives to give unity to our 
knowledge, 168; is the fource of all Phi- 
lofophy, ib. is felf-legiflative, and efta- 
blifhes a rule for our condudt, 169; its 
firjl ftep was Dogmatical, its fecond Scep¬ 
tical, its lafi Critical, ib. its higheft ufe 
muft be grounded upon a Critical knowledge 
of the mind, 170 ; acknowledges the 
great object of all Philofophy, 171 ; re¬ 
conciles all the impulfes of human na¬ 
ture, ib. determines what we muft defire 
and what we ought to do, 173 ; its effence 
is to give unity and completenefs to our 
knowledge and defires, 174; muft com¬ 
pletely acquire the knowledge of its own 
powers, 186 ; is the faculty which con¬ 
tains the principles of knowledge a priori, 
ib. endeavours to obtain the gieateft 
unity of knowledge, 209; the natural illu- 
. fens of this faculty explained, 212; fet up 
a Moral Law which ought to be follow¬ 
ed, though it never is followed, 221 ; 
never refers immediately to objedts as 
the Underftanding, 235 ; the regulative 
ufe of its Ideas, ib. its three principles, 
fmilarity, difference, and relationfkip, 237; 
its faults are termed, firft, Indolent Reafon, 
and fecond, Perverted Reafon, 239; its po¬ 
lemical ufe means the protection of its 
principles againft dogmatical attacks,243; 
until it adopts the critical method, every 
thing remains as it was, 244; its prin¬ 
ciples are not confiitutive, but are merely 
regulative, 246; in its fpeculative ufe has 
no Canon, 247 ; in its praEHcal ufe it has a 
Canon, the Moral Law, ib. its final 
end, ib. 
Receptivity, a paffive faculty, divided into 
two parts, Internal and External Senfe, 
127 ; receives imprefiions from objedts 
diftinCt from itfelf, 128; is acted upon by 
the Noumenon, ib. is the capability of 
having a tenfation which furnitlies the 
matter of Reprefentation, 152; the fa¬ 
culty of receiving impreffions of objedts, 
’ 93 - . 
Regulative Principle of Pure Reafon with 
refpeCl to the Cofmological Ideas, 224; 
ufe of this principle, 223. 
Reid (Dr.) of Glafgow, tranflated a Svnop- 
fis of Kant’s Philofophy, 124; one of the 
ablelt adverfarits of Hume’s Theory, 149; 
did not perceive the concefiions Hume 
forced from him,ib. 
Relation explained, 130; of Philofophy to 
the other feiences, 177; to enlighten¬ 
ment, 179. 
Religion proved tc be a Duty of Man, 129 ; 
PHILOSOPHY. 
eftablilhes the complete harmony of 
Religion and Reafon, 149 ; fometimes 
blended with fuperftition, 177. 
Reinhold (Charles Leonard), has thrown 
1 great light on Kant’s fyftem, 129 ; his 
New Theory of the ReprcfentingFaculty, 134; 
completely comprehends Kant’s Phiio- 
fophy, 145 ; exhibits with aftonilhing ac¬ 
curacy and clearntfsthe entire foundation 
of Kant’s fyftem, 160 ; his Letters on 
Kant’s Philofophy, 177. 
Reprefentation, Mr. Stewart ftates to be the 
German fubftitute for Idea, 133; it is ef- 
fential that this word fhould be com¬ 
pletely underftoad, ib. 
Refults of Sense,Un perstanding, and 
Reason, are Intuition, Conception, and 
Idea, 134; of the unparalleled Map of the 
Mind, ib. 
Revolution fhould never take place by a 
Ihock, 182; this may be prevented by the 
early cultivation of the rifing generation, 
ib. 
Richter (Henry), urges the neceflity of an 
examination of Kant’s Syftem, 159; his 
excellent and concife account of Kant’s 
Philofophy, ib. author of a letter figned 
A Friend to true Metaphysics, 
160; his work entitled Day Light, a new 
Difcovery in the art of Painting, ib. 
Right and Wrong completely developed by 
Philofophy, 177. 
Rights and Duties that flow from the focial 
relations, 181. 
Saint Pierre, his reveries on a Perpetual 
Peace, 155. 
Sceptic, his mode of philofophizing explain¬ 
ed, 117; if he had difeovered the nature 
of the Mental Faculties, would not have 
funk into defpair, 175; what right has he 
to maintain that Reafon cannot determine 
our knowledge ? 170; often miftakes his 
proper occupation, and affumes philofophic 
airs, 244 ; attacks the opinions of the 
Dogmatift, ib. for want of the limits of 
knowledge, doubts of its validity, 245. 
Sceptical view of the Cofmological Ideas, 222. 
Scepticism vanquithed for ever, no; its 
hidden principles laid open, ib. its nature 
explained, 168 ; arifes from Dogmatifm, 
lS6 ; can never fatisfy Reafon, 245; 
when it has made the Dogmatift doubt, 
it has done its duty, 245. 
Schelling, departed from the paths of Kant, 
and mifconceived his principle of Sub- 
jeElive P.eality, 153. 
Schema, the image of a Conception, or of 
fome objedt we have feen, 198; of Quan- 
tity, is number in general ; of Quality, de¬ 
gree in genetal ; of Subftance, isperdtirabi- 
lity in Tune', of Caufe, is determinate fuc- 
ce]]ion\ of Concurrence, coex'ftence in 
Space', of Poliibility, being in any Time-, 
of Exiftence, being in a certain Time; of Ne- 
ceffity, being in all Time, 198; is a Cate- 
goryreniered fenfible by means of Time, ib. 
Schlegel, his literary charadter; 136; allift- 
ed Mad. de Stael in her view of Kant’s 
Philofophy, ib. 
Schultz (Johann), authorofan ll Elucidation 
of the Critic of Pure Reafon,” 156; the il¬ 
legitimacy of all ancient fyftems is now 
depefited in our philofophical archives, 
ib. this work contains the moft familiar 
account ot Kant’s fyftem, ib. perfedtly 
comprehended this fublime fcience, and 
wonders why the Critic is not as plain to 
others as to himfeif,ib. gives a clear expla¬ 
nation of Kant’s new technical terms, 
157 - 
Science is a whole of knowledge, arranged 
3 
259 
fyftematically, 168; of Reafon and of Ex¬ 
perience, ib. 
Scnfation, received by the hand or the eye, 
does not conftitute knowledge, 111 ; can 
only exift in the fentient being, 127; ele¬ 
vated into objeSis by the 12 Categories, 
128; while prefent, is Intuition, 129; its 
nature and properties explained, ib. mo¬ 
dified by the Underftmding, 130; cannot 
be defined by Mr. Dugald Stewart, 133; 
clothed with the forms of Time and 
Space, conftitutes the objedts of nature, 
I53; converted into a world of intelligi¬ 
ble and diftindt objedts by the Under¬ 
ftanding, 159 ; is the effedt of an objedt 
upon our Repr efenting Faculty, 187; is Em¬ 
pirical Intuition, 191. 
Sense, a pafiive faculty that receives the 
matter of all the phenomena of Nature, 
109; has two Receptivities, Time 
and Space, ib. impreffes upon every ob¬ 
jedt that affedts us Extension and 
Succession, hi ; its nature deter¬ 
mined, 118; feparated from Underfanding 
and Reafon, 119; its efiential diltindtion 
pointed out, 125 ; completely analyzed, 
127; its very elements are Time and Space, 
and muft therefore be always prefent to 
it, 128; the ftorehoufe and foie proprietor 
of all the Matter in Nature, 129; as a re¬ 
ceptacle of matter, is the corner-ftone of 
Kant's Syftem, 132; receives impreffions, 
and connedts them into Intuitions, 152; 
a Spontaneity of the firft degree, ib. com¬ 
municates its own forms or modes of per¬ 
ceiving to the objedts, 158 ; receives the 
rude matter upon which the Underftanding 
operates, 159; can only receive a variety 
of parts, ib. is the Rock upon which 
Kant’s Philofophy ftands, ib. and Under¬ 
ftanding reprefent to us the objedts of 
experience, 169, the faculty of receiving 
reprefentations from being afdeiSted by ob¬ 
jedts, 187 ; can never furnifh a know¬ 
ledge of the things in thenfelves, 191 ; 
furnifhes Intuitions, 205. 
Senfible horizon explained, 244. 
Sketch of a complete fyftem of all the phi¬ 
lofophical feiences, 172. 
Smith (Mr.) ftates that our univerfities are 
repofitories for exploded fyftems, 120. 
Snell (Chriftian and William), fully com¬ 
prehend Transcendental Philo¬ 
sophy, 113; have clothed it in popular 
language, and prepared it for the fchools, 
ib. have formed an Encyclopaedia on Kan- 
tefian principles, ib. have re-modelled 
the feiences upon the immutable bafis 
of Kant’s Philofophy, 129. 
Society founded on Tranfcendental Philofophy 
would render this World a Paradife, 118. 
Solution of the Cofmological Conflict of 
Reafon with itfelf, 223. 
Sophifma figurae didtionis, 224. 
Sophiftry would deprive us of the moft fa- 
cred gift we pofTefs, 175 ; deftroys with 
one ftroke the whole ablolute worth of 
human nature, ib. 
Sovereign Good is when Virtue is the caufe 
of Happinels, 154. 
Soul of Man does not exift in Time and Space, 
111 ; never can addrefs the Senfes, 134 ; 
its immortality proved, ib. its peace and 
tranquility obtained by Philofophy, 176; 
examined by Rational Plychology, 213; 
may be con fide red as a Ample fubftance,245. 
Space, a repofitory of knowledge inhe¬ 
rent in the Mind, 110; fuppofed not to 
he in the Mind, ib. independent of the 
Mind, totally deftroys all knoudedge, 11 1; 
a mode or form of receiving, ib. confifts 
of 
