Tlieift adopts a Natural Theology, while the 
Delft only admits a Tranfcendental Theo¬ 
logy, 234. 
Theology is founded upon the Idea of Abfo¬ 
lute Concurrence, 153 ; an abfolute intel¬ 
ligent firft Caufe, 210 ; the knowledge of 
an Original Being, 234. 
Theoretical Reafon ftrives after the greateft 
connexion of our knowledge, 127 ; diredts 
its flight on the wings of its ideas, 153. 
Things in themfel-ves are the ground of our 
perceptions, 170. 
Thejis and Antithefs of Pure Reafon, 216 ; 
the proofs of both are defedtive, 2243 a 
difpute about nothing, for the pofitions are 
not contradidlorily oppofed, and may both 
be falfe, ib. 
Thoughts are evidently effedts of the mind, 
127 - 
Time, a repofitory of knowledge inherentin 
the Mind, no ; fuppofed not to be in the 
Mind, ib. independent of the Mind, 
totally deftroys all knowledge, in 5 
nothing can enter time without being fuc- 
cefllve, ib. a mode or form of receiving, ib. 
confifts of a variety of parts in ftridt fuc- 
cejfon, 127 ; is always prefent to mind, 
128; a pure intuition, ib. a Subjedtive 
Reality, 132 ; is attendant on every 
mental operation, 163; an intuition a priori, 
187 ; the form of Internal Senfe, ib. its 
metaphyfical expofltion, 189; is the foun¬ 
dation of all Intuition, ib. Axioms of Time in 
general, ib. is the pats form vf Senfible In¬ 
tuition, ib. is infinite, ib. its tranfcenden- 
tal expofltion, ib. is the form of Internal 
Senfe, 189 ; it can be no determination of 
external phenomena, for it has neither 
fhape nor ftuation, it is mere fucceffion, ib. 
is the immediate condition of the internal 
phenomena, ib. is nothing independent of 
the Mind, ib. it does not in any way 
belong to things in themfel-ves, 190; is the 
condition under which the Mind is affedt- 
ed by its own adls, and thus produces In¬ 
ternal Intuition, 198. 
Time and Space : out of their fphere, we can 
have no knowledge whatever, 119 ; they 
have ever been (fumbling-blocks in Meta- 
phyfics, 125 ; difplayed in a Map of the 
Mind, 127 5 can exift no-where but in the 
Mind, 128 ; are pure intuitions, ib. are the 
dements of Senfe, 130; their neceflity 
difcufled between Clarke and Leibnitz, 
131; fubjedtive realities, 132; the confo- 
litary refults of this new Theory, 134; 
forms- inherent in the Senfitive Faculty 
anterior to all impreffion, 153; do not 
belong to the objedts of our knowledge, 
but to the Knowing Faculty, 158; are 
forms with which the Knowing Faculty 
clothe the phenomena, ib. arc modes of the 
Senfti-ve Faculty which we (lamp upon all 
the things we behold, 159; this pofition 
ihown to be felf-evident, 160 5 are they 
properties which adhere to the things, or 
do they belong to the Mind ? 167 3 they 
are the pure forms of all intuitions, and exift 
in us prior to all intuition, ib. cartnot be 
annihilated, 1703 it is idle to endeavour 
to know any thing of thefe limits, 175 ; 
forms of the Senfti-ve Faculty, 187; what 
are they ? are they real things ? i 83 ; refer 
to objedts as phenomena, but not as things 
in themfel-ves, 190; it is abfolutely certain 
that they are merely conditions of the 
mind, and that the objedts of nature are 
only appearances, 192; are independent of 
all objedts of experience, 195. 
PHILOSOPHY. 
Touchftone of true knowledge, 246. 
Tranfcendent and Tranfcendental explained, 
208; the former is knowledge a priori 
that applies to experience, the latter that 
knowledge which pretends to overftep 
thefe limits, ib. 
Tranfcendent Idealifm, an erroneous fyftem 
that attributes every thing to mental 
adlivity, 171. 
Tranfcendental Efthetics, a complete Analy- 
fis of the Senfti-ve Faculty, 112 ; fully ex¬ 
plains the nature of Time and Space, 187. 
Tranfcendental Ideal, to reprefent mankind as 
in aprogreffive moral improvement, 230. 
Tranfcendental Logic points out thofe laws 
by which the thinking of an objedl is pof- 
fible, 193; Analyfis of Conceptions, ib. all 
relations of thinking are thofe of the pre¬ 
dicate to the SubjeB, 194 ; a judgment is 
determined in its matter by Quantity, Qua¬ 
lity, and Relation 5 Modality only deter¬ 
mines its relation to the Knowing 
Faculty, ib. treats of Conceptions, Judg¬ 
ments, and Conclufons, 197; a completely- 
perfedt analytical fcience, quite diftindl 
from all others, as it excludes all matter 
of thought, ib. has dilcovered certain 
conceptions and judgments as the property 
of Underftanding, 208. 
Transcendental Philosophy, the 
fcience which eftablilhes all the Elements 
of the Human Mind, viz. Sense, Under¬ 
standing, and Reason, 109 ; is the 
only true Philofophy, ib. applies its prin¬ 
ciples to the objedts of experience, 1103 
the very eflence and foundation of all true 
knowledge, ib. capable of being conveyed 
with eafe into the tender minds of youth, 
113; firft difeovered by Kant, 119; em¬ 
bodies the truth fcattered over all former 
fyftems, 123 ; this immenfe fabric could 
not have been eredted unlefs Time and 
Space had been explained, 132; this fcience 
did not exift prior to Kant, 142; the dog¬ 
matical phitofopher never could conceive 
the poflibility of fuch a fcience, ib. com¬ 
pletely comprehended by Reinhold, 145; 
not only fully comprehended by Monf. C. 
Vill.ers, but its pradticul application dif¬ 
played, 149 ; 43 Confecutive Principles 
which contain the eflence of the fyftem, 
162 ; the beneficial revolution which it 
has produced will he gratefully acknow¬ 
ledged by fucceeding generations, 163 5 
a fyftem of conceptions a priori, 186; is a 
fcience, the Idea of which i3 delineated by 
the ‘ Critic of Pure Reafon ’, 1873 mu ft 
contain the analyfis of the entire field of 
human knowledge a priori, ib. the funda¬ 
mental principles of Morality do not 
belong to this fcience, id is therefore only 
a fpeculati-ve fcience, for every thing profit¬ 
ed! refers to feeling, which is empirical, 
ib. proves the legality of the ufe of the 
Categories, 193 ; is the fcience whofe po¬ 
fitions apply a priori to objedts, 221 5 its 
pofitions can only have one proof, a Ma¬ 
thematical pofition may have many, 246. 
Truth, with what ardour will it be purfued 
when early prejudices are conquered, 122 ; 
its office is to add convidtion to philofophi- 
cal impreflions, ib. its nature inveftigated, 
151 3 its ordinary definition muft be 
renounced, ib. man is in conftant fearch 
of Truth from his very nature, 174. 
Tycho, his fyftem obfolete, 129. 
Van Hemert, his Work on Kant’s Philofo¬ 
phy, 158. 
Varieties, only two in all Nature, 127. 
3 * 
261 
Vice, when once it has gained dominion over 
the mind, deftroys every germ of what is 
good and noble, 176; is more hoftile to 
Virtue than the moft unreftrained fenfual- 
ity,1b. 
Villers (Charles), author of “Eftai fur 
l’Efprit et 1’Influence de la Reformation 
de Luther,” alfo of “ Coup-d’ceil fur les 
Univerfites d’Allemagne,” 149 ; gives a 
comprehenfive view of the tendency of 
Kant’s Syftern, 1553 proves that he tho¬ 
roughly underliands the fyftem, ib. author 
of “ Philofophie de Kant,” written in 
the moft popular ftyle, ib. 
Virtue has no empire but confcience, and no 
arms but thofe of remorfe, no treafure but 
the inward enjoyment of Soul, 135 3 its 
abfolute worth, 171. 
Understanding, an adtive faculty that 
gives laws to the phenomena of Nature by 
its iz Adtivities or Categories, 109 ; 
eflentially diftindl from the Senfti-ve Fa¬ 
culty, 125; gives an intelligent form to 
the matter received by Senfe, 127; a 
Spontaneity or adtive faculty which produ¬ 
ces form or unity, 127 ; forms conceptions, 
and is the fecond degree of Spontaneity, 
152 3 operates according to its own laws, 
which are the Categories, 153 ; is the con- 
nedting power which gives the boundary 
to the (hapelefs fenfation, 1595 when it 
ventures to fpeculate without found con¬ 
ceptions, the imagination is fure to inter¬ 
fere, 1663 how comes it by knowledge 
a priori, and what is its extent, validity, 
and worth, 184 ; its firft adl is connexion, 
which prefuppofes a -variety, 195 ; appli¬ 
cation of its laws (the Categories) to Em¬ 
pirical Intuition, 204 ; which intuits the 
objecls themfel-ves without their matter being 
gi-ven, is faid to create, 205 ; produces con- 
ceptions, ib. 
Univerfal Logic, abftradts from the objedls 
and exhibits the rules of thinking, 193 ; 
is either pure or applied, ib. 
Uni-verfality and Necefity are the criteria of 
knowledge a priori, 183. 
Volition cannot be defined by Mr. Dugald 
Stewart, 133. 
Vortices, the fyftem of, has given way to 
the laws of gravitation, 129. 
Urban VIII. perfecuted Copernicus, 129. 
Will, is fenfual when it is pathologically 
affedted, brutal when necefiarily determi¬ 
ned by thefe motives, 226 ; the Human 
Will is a fenfual but not a brutal one, it is 
free becaufe it is not necefiarily determined 
by Sense, for man has another faculty to 
determine his Will, i. e. Reason, 169. 
Willich (Dr.), his Elements of the Cri¬ 
tical Philofophy, 124 ; contains a fynopfis 
by John Schutze, tianllated by Dr. Reid, 
ib. is not a critic of Kant’s fyftem, ib. 
attended Kant's ledtures, ib. vindicated, 
ib. his account of Kant’s aim, 123 3 his 
account of Time and Space, which have 
ever been (tumbling-blocks in Metaphyfics, 
125 ; his deferiptive Catalogue of Kant’s 
numerous Works, 160. 
Wolf took up the nature and origin of 
knowledge in a wrong point of view, 191. 
World, is governed by laws, the type of 
which is in ourfelves, 135 ; of phenomena , 
is unlike the world in itlelf, 153. 
Writers of the fecond and third rank in 
Germany are equal to thofe of the firft 
rank in other countries, 136. 
Vot. XX. No. 1366. 
