Questions Evolution Does Not Answer 
is exactly what Keith’s arguments 
would lead us to expect.” (Lull, 
“ Evolution of Man,” p. 37.) 
Keith’s contention is that Homo 
sapiens appeared at a remote time, 
flourished for awhile, and dis¬ 
appeared, to be replaced by the 
more primitive, but not ancestral, 
Neandertal man of Mousterian 
time.” (Lull, “Evolution of Man,” 
p. 35.) That is to say, the Heidel¬ 
berg man, the Java man and the 
Piltdown man are not connecting 
links between modern man and his 
supposed ape-like ancestors, be¬ 
cause Homo sapiens was on the 
scene when they arrived, if not 
before. 
So far as historic man is con¬ 
cerned, there is no evidence of 
marked progress or development. 
Professor Conklin says: “In bodily 
evolution man has made no very 
marked progress during the last 
71 
