it 
' 
>26 ILLINOIS STATE DAIRYMEN’S ASSOCIATION. 
not Elgin milk—and for this reason the committee deems it 
best to refer the matter to this State Convention; the man 
/one! we must demolish his theory; the experiments were 
mere failures; did not wish to get into a conflict wth - 
Arnold, but as his theory had become world-wide, 
to be dem moderation; was inclined to be for 
‘‘the under dog in the light;” thought it best not to be too 
hlstv demolish the theory, and let the man alone; would 
lias y, a ]_]_ are liable to eir, 
say nothing disparaging 1 ’’ . a a . ma ^ e it 
was pleased with the report; did not deem it best to make 
more pointed. 
On motion, the report was accepted. 
The convention now adjourned, to meet at 2 p. m. 
Wednesday, Dec. 15, 1875—2 p. m. 
^ Mtood that in w at t lie 
said with regard to Mr. Arnold’s charge against Western 
milk he did not wish to impeach Mr. Arn , 
spoke in self-defense as a Western dairyman. 
P L h. Wanzer being called for, said he was satisfied v 
the reoort, but could not indorse it in full. 
G. P. Lord said as the charge was in no sense local, he 
would like to hear from those abroad. 
C H Wilder, of Wisconsin, was satisfied u ith the rep 
read as it completely refuted Mr. Arnold’s theory, and that 
was what we wished to accomplish; should in no way reflect 
jndo-e Wilcox did not deem it wise to regard Mr. A as 
Yi.nritv in dairying as his sweeping charge against 
authority • y ° postern milk was all based upon 
one single experiment; it was a matter of great importance, 
and should be candidly and impartially dealt with. 
G. P. Lord here criticised the Arnold communication, as 
