Delamere Forest (Gregson, Ac.), Liverpool (F. Birch), Carlisle (Hodgkinson), Glas¬ 
gow (Dalglish), Bannoch (Weaver, Christy, &c.), Aberdeen (Horne, Cannon, 
Buchan, &c.), Kincardineshire (Horne), ?? Isle of Lewis (intermediate between 
autumnata and jiligrammaria), Belfast (Kane, Entom., xxx., p. 234), Enniskillen 
(Partridge, Brown, Allen). 
France : Central France (Guenee), Chateandun (Guenee), Pont de l’Arche, 
Eure (Dupont), Chamounix (Linnean Society’s collection), Cannes (Chapman). 
Switzerland : Val d’Anniviers (de Rougement), Zermatt (Pungeler). 
Germany: Hanover (Hoffmann), Brunswick, Giessen, Leipsic (Heyne), Pome¬ 
rania (Frey coll.), Aix-la-Chapelle, Dresden (Piingeler). 
Austria : Gratz (Bohatsch), Schneeberg (Bohatsch), Buda-Pesth (Leech coll.). 
Norway and Sweden : Common, and apparently generally distributed, Stock¬ 
holm, Smaland, Upland, Tromso, Ac. 
Russia : North Finland (received through Staudinger), St. Petersburg (Zeller 
coll., from Kolenati). 
I consider also that it is this species rather than dilntata which 
extends through Labrador to the mainland of North America ; in the 
National Collection there is in addition a short series of a very 
interesting Epirrita (Oporabia) from Esquimalt, Vancouver Island, 
which is either an extreme variety of autumnata or a related species, 
while O. japonaria, Leech, Entom. Supply 1891, p. 48, from Japan, is 
also nearer to autumnata than to dilntata. 
NOTES ON EUP1THECIA CORONATA, Hb. 
(Read November 7th, 1899, by LOUIS B. PROUT, F.E.S.). 
I do not suppose there can he any doubt as to the Eupitheciid 
affinities of this species ; but it is by no means certain that it is 
absolutely congeneric with the majority of the Eupitheeias. lliibner 
in his Yerzeiehniss subdivides the pugs into a number of genera, 
most of which have not been accepted; but among them is Chloro- 
clystis, erected for the three green species known to him— corunata, 
rrctanf/ulata and debiliata. To these would now of course be added 
the recently discovered chloerata of Mabille—by the bye, when are we 
going to turn this up in Britain ? I believe it is a blackthorn feeder. 
Meyrick in his Handbook follows lliibner with respect to this genus, 
its differential character being that nervure 11 of the forewings runs 
into, or anastomoses with 12. Tutt, in his British Moths likewise 
accepts this genus. But I must confess that I am not wholly satisfied 
with this arrangement; despite the superficial resemblance of corunata 
to rectanr/ulata, which has led Gumppenberg to sink the former as 
“ rectanyulata var. corunata ” [! !], 1 feel some hesitancy in uniting them 
in the same genus, though unfortunately I have not sufficient acquaint¬ 
ance with the early stages to be able to suggest any definite 
re-arrangement. The following points appear to me to be worthy of 
consideration: 
1. The shape of the wings is different in corunata, the forewings 
being very broad, and the hindiyings rather small; and correlated with 
