BIRDS—TURBID A E-TURDUS. 
209 
brown, breast with large brown spots.”) The large brown spots are not found in fuscescens. 
Gmelin describes T. minor as ‘ ‘spadiceus, pectore Jlavicante, maculis atris,” (reddish brown, breast 
yellowish with Mach spots.) His name is, therefore, clearly to be set aside in the further discus¬ 
sion of the question. 
I have not now the means of verifying the accuracy of the reference of Turdus parvus of 
Selgimann to this species, made by me many years ago ; but if correct, then this name may have 
to take precedence, unless a true Turdus parvus had been previously described. 
Turdus ustulatus of Nuttall has been mentioned alone by him, and has no synonyms, as far 
as I can ascertain. By a typographical error the name was printed cestulatus. 
By a remarkable oversight the olive-backed thrush, (T. sivainsonii ,) though well known to 
all of the more recent school of American ornithologists, was not described by either Wilson or 
Audubon. It was given by Swainson as Merula wilsonii, erroneously supposing it to be the 
species referred to by Bonaparte under this name. His figure of M. solitaria is very probably 
this same species. The figure given by Wilson to accompany his description of Turdus solitarius 
(pallasii) unquestionably belongs to T. sivainsonii. As previously stated, the T. minor of Gmelin 
applies in part to this species ; that of Yieillot to this species, in conjunction with T. pallasii . 
In the latter part of 1843 Mr. Giraud, a leading American ornithologist, and author of 
several important works, published the species as Turdus olivaceus ; and Dr. Brewer, without 
knowing the fact, gave it the same name in 1844. This has really priority, unless the Turdus 
brunneus of Boddaert, based on PL enlum. 556, fig. 2, be really and incontestibly the present 
species, as claimed by Gray in the Genera of Birds. The term olivaceus , however, had pre¬ 
viously been used by Linnaeus and Boddaert, as well as by Lichtenstein and others, in connexion 
with thrushes, and cannot be retained, unless these are shown to belong to genera other than 
that of the present species. Not having access at present to the Planches enluminees, I am 
unable to discuss the value of Boddaert’s name. 
In Tschudi’s Fauna Peruana, published between 1844 and 1846, Cabanis gives accurate 
diagnoses of the American thrushes, showing their relations to each other, although in this he 
had been anticipated by Dr. Brewer in the Proceedings of the Boston Society of Natural 
History for July, 1844. He there applies the name of T. swainsonii to the olive-backed species, 
which, in the present state of our knowledge of the question, must be retained. 
The Turdus pallasii of Cabanis— T. solitarius of Wilson—first received a distinctive name in 
Wiegmann’s Archiv, in 1847. Wilson’s name had previously been employed by Linnaeus and 
others for a different thrush. The species was at first called T. minor by Bonaparte and Audu¬ 
bon, erroneously supposing it to be the bird referred to by Gmelin ; in their later works, how¬ 
ever, these authors took Wilson’s name. In the article already referred to in Fauna Peruana, 
Cabanis identified this species with Muscicapa guttata of Pallas, which, however, he afterwards 
found to be distinct. 
The Merula silens of Swainson, if really identical with the present species, will take priority 
over Cabanis’ name ; but I am inclined to consider it distinct for reasons named elsewhere. 
The remaining species was named and described by Audubon as Turdus nanus. In his 
article in the Fauna Peruana, Cabanis considered the Turdus aonalaschka of Gmelin and 3fusci- 
capa guttata of Pallas as young birds of the Turdus solitarius of Wilson. -The locality— 
Russian America—and the small size clearly indicate that the names, if belonging to either, 
apply to the dwarf rather than to the hermit thrush. In the Muscicapa guttata of Pallas it is 
difficult to recognize even a young bird of this species—in the •“ body brown above, spotted 
27 b 
