Insects and Flowers 
581 
green leaves and provided with honey are visited (from the attraction of the 
“natural vegetable odor”). From these observations Plateau concludes 
that “ insects are guided with certainty to flowers with pollen or nectar by 
a sense other than that of vision and which can only be that oj smell ,” and 
finds particular proof of this in the facts, according to his observations, (1) 
that insects tend, without hesitation, towards flowers usually neglected by 
reason of the absence or poverty of nectar, from the moment that one 
supplies these flowers with artificial nectar, represented by honey; (2) that 
insects cease their visits when one cuts out the nectary without injuring 
the colored parts, and re-begin their visits if one replaces the destroyed nec¬ 
tary by honey; (3) that it suffices to attract numerous insects if one puts 
honey on or in normally anemophilous flowers, simply green or brown in 
color, which are normally practically invisible and almost never visited by 
insects; and (4) that the visiting of flowers artificially made of fresh green 
leaves and containing honey demonstrates plainly the role of the sense of 
smell. 
It must be said that, despite many just criticisms which may be made on 
the character of his experiments, Plateau has made necessary more experi¬ 
mentation for the relief of the general theory that floral adaptation of color 
is due to the color preferences of insect visitors. It seems to me probable 
that the truth of the matter is in a large degree expressed by the statement 
that the distant attraction is exerted by the odors of flowers working on a 
very sensitive sense of smell in insects (chemotropism, in the language of 
the modern believers in reflexes), while the intimate guiding to'the particu¬ 
lar flower and the nectary is controlled chiefly by the color and pattern. 
Finally we come to the question of the origin of this mutually advan¬ 
tageous interrelation and its many-branched course of development or 
specialization. Advantage and natural selection are looked on as the chief 
factors in this development. “It is extremely probable,” says the botanist 
Campbell, “that all the primitive flowers were anemophilous (cross-polli¬ 
nated by the wind), and that from these have been derived the more special¬ 
ized entomophilous and ornithophilous forms. It is evidently of advantage 
to the plant to have the great waste of pollen necessitated by wind-pollina¬ 
tion reduced, and this is possible when insects or birds are the agents in its 
transfer. It is probable that entomophily began by the casual visits of 
insects to flowers, attracted by the pollen, which is still the principal object 
of visits by many insects, serving as an important source of food. Flowers 
which had more conspicuous stamens or perianth would stand a better chance 
of visits from insects, and from the slight variations thus started may have 
proceeded the development of the conspicuous flowers of the modern ento¬ 
mophilous plants.” To attract insects not pollen-eaters the development 
of the nectar has been necessary. However sweet-smelling or beautiful, 
