32 
U. S. P. R. R. EXP. AND SURVEYS-ZOOLOGY-47TH PARALLEL. 
dehiscent, and the mesosternum at the tip compressed and carinate as in Notiophilus. From 
the latter genus it differs hy the very short emarginate lahrum, hy the more distinct, hut also 
bicuspid mentum-tooth, and hy the less prolonged prosternum. Of the anterior tarsi of the 
male, the first and second joints are dilated ; the third and fourth are small an equal. 
AMPHIZOIDAE. 
Coleoptera pentamera, pedibus ambulatoriis, antennis filiformibus; prothoracis episternis a 
noto sutura divisis, acetahulis anticis postice hientihus; coxis anticis et mediis globosis, posticis 
transversis ad marginem corporis extensis, contiguis, antice truncatis, postice ad insertionem 
pedum elevatis ; mento magno emarginato, cum gula omnino connato, (sutura nulla ;) maxillis 
loho interno curvato acuto, intus parce spinoso, galea elongata palpiformi exarticulata; abdo- 
mine sex-articulato, articulis anterioribus tribus connatis. 
n the above diagnosis I have placed an assemblage of characters which seem fully to justify 
the establishment of a separate family for the reception of the very remarkable Amphizoa 
insolens. A detailed description may he found in the 6th volume of the Proceedings of the 
Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, (p. 227;) I there express the opinion that it would 
not enter any family of Adephaga as then constituted, and brief allusion was made to the large 
size of the posterior coxae, which cut off all connexion between the metathorax and the ventral 
abdominal segments, as indicating an affinity with the Dytiscidae, a view which, also, seemed 
to he confirmed hy the subglabrous antennae; at the same time the ambulatorial legs showed a 
tendency towards the Carahidae. Since there appeared to he, however, no very strong resem¬ 
blance in the structure of the legs, though ambulatorial, with those of Carabus, I did not insist 
very strongly on the latter affinity. 
Lacordaire has, in the excellent work now being published hy him on the Genera of Coleoptera, 
(Vol. 1, p. 409,) introduced an abstract of the description given hy me, hut not considering 
the characters sufficiently important to define a new family, has placed the genus as a tribe of 
Dytiscidae, equal in value to Pelobius. A misunderstanding of some expression used hy me 
has, unfortunately, led him to place in the diagnosis of the tribe, ‘ hanches posterieures . . 
.non contigues au cote interne;’ which is not the case; the coxae come 
together on the median line, as in Pelobius, Dytiscus, &c., hut differ in the anterior margin 
being transverse and rectilinear, while in all true Dytiscidae (Haliplus and Cnemidotus being 
excluded) the anterior outline is rounded ; the posterior lobes above the insertion of the hind 
feet are more distant and less elevated. The second ventral segment is prolonged anteriorly 
in an obtuse angle, and articulates with the coxae, so that the first segment is entirely lateral, 
as in Carahidae. From this it results that no part of the metathorax reaches the ventral 
segments of the abdomen, all communication being cut off hy the coxae extending to the sides 
of the body. 
Another character not found in any other Adepliagous insect, is the complete union without 
any visible suture between the gula and menturn; this fact is of great importance, and upon it 
the argument for the separation of this as a new family must to a considerable extent rest. I 
regret that it was omitted in my former description, although observed while making a re¬ 
examination for the present report; to Dr. Schaum, also, I owe my acknowledgments for a 
