254 
ORIGINAL ARTICLES. 
that of ChhrantJius, (p. 244.)—Schacht. Pflanzenzelle, 438.— 
Thuja. Link, H. E. leones Selectae, 1840, Ease. ii. y. 11.— 
Goeppert, De Coniferarum Structura, 1841. — Salisburia. Schultz, 
C. H. Die Cyklose, Nova. Acta. 1841, xyiii. Suppl. ii. tab. xxiv.— 
Schleiden. Notice of Goeppert’s De Coniferarum Structura. Neu. 
Jenaer Allg. Lit. Zeit. 1842, No. 15. Principles of Botany, 45.— 
Quekett, E. J. Remarks on the examination of some Eossil Woods, 
which tend to elucidate the structure of certain Tissues in the 
recent plant. Linn. Trans, xx. 149. On the discs of the wood- 
cells.—Bischoff, Lehrbuch, ii. 61, tab. ii. 50—1.—E. J, E. Meyen, 
Neues Syst. Pflanz. Phys. fig. t. iii.—Guillemin, M. Markings on 
prosenchyma of Coniferse. Comptes Rendus. iii. 761.— Taxus bac- 
cata. Mohl, H. v. Ueber d. Ban des Cycadeen-Stammes und 
sein Verhaltniss zu dem Stamme d. Coniferen und Baumfarn. 
Abh. Ak. Wiss. Miinchen. i. 399. tab. xyiii. 3, 5. Longitudinal 
sections of the wood.— Salisburia. Tab. xix. 11. Longitudinal 
section.— Agathis. Griffith, Notulse, iv. 19. On the vascular 
fascicles, &c. — Mohl, H. y. Bot. Zeit. 1855, 891. On liber of 
Coniferae.—Hanstein, J. Leber den Bau des Dicotylen Holzringes. 
Pringsheim’s Jahrb. i. 248. The relations subsisting between 
the arrangement of the leaves and the wood-structure in Taxus , 
JPodocarpus, Cryptomeria; with figs.— Taxus. Trecul, A. Bull. 
Soc. Bot. i. 274. On secondary formations in the wood cells.— 
Taxus , Torreya. Mohl, H. v. Yeget. Cell. 18— Taxus , Araucaria , 
Salisburia. Quekett. Histology, fig. 85.—Henfrey. A. Micr. 
Diet. ‘Wood,’with figs.—Schacht, H. Die Pflanzenzelle, pp. 180, 
195, 435. tabb. xii—xiv. A tabular review is given of the ana¬ 
tomical relations of the wood of several genera of Coniferae, in 
respect to the form and arrangement of the liber-cells and layers, 
presence or absence of resin-canals in the bark or wood, defini¬ 
tion of the annual zones, the dotting of the wood-cells and cells 
of the medullary rays, the form of the ‘ pore-canals,’ &c. Lehr¬ 
buch, i. 229. Der Baum. 187, &c. Pinus sylvestris. pp. 180, 
197, and tab. xii—xiv.—Dippel. Leber die Entstehung und d. 
Bau der Tiipfel. Bot. Zeit. 1860,329, with figs.— Gnetum. Voyage 
de la Coquille. Atlas Bot. 1826, i. 11, 12.—Richard. Nouv. 
Elemens de Botanique, 1846, 157.—Blume, Rumphia, iv. 1848, 9. 
tab. 176.—Jussieu, Ad. de., Monograph des Malpighiacees, p. 
125.—Griffith, Notulae, iv, 32.—Radlkofer, L. Leber das anomale 
Wachsthum des Stammes bei Menispermeen. Elora, 1858, 206. 
The stem-structure differs from that of Menisperms only in that 
each zone (not the innermost only) of wood-bundles possesses 
its corresponding liber-layer.— Welwitschia mirabilis. A detailed 
account, with numerous figures of the wood-structure of this 
singular plant, by Dr. Hooker, will appear in the Linnean Trans, 
xxiv. part i. It is referred by him to Gnetaceae; the structure 
of the flower resembling, in many points, that of Gnetum and 
Tphedra. Erom the non-development of a distinct ascending 
