PHANEIt 0 G AMI A. 
613 
Schultz, F. G.—The Synonymy of a few species of Mentha. Bull. 
Soc. Bot. ix. p. 222. 
— - Der Torf. Pollichia, xviii. xix. p. 29. The formation of peat, 
and the plants taking part in it. 
-Bemerkungen liber zwei neuerdings von franzosischen 
Schriftstellern verwechselte pfalzer Pllanzen. Ibid. p. 34. With 
1 plate. 
--Tabelle der in der Pfalz und den benachbarten Gegenden 
vorkommenden Arten der Gattung Verbascum, sowie der in die- 
sem Gebiete bereits gefundenen und noch zu suchenden Bastarde 
aus derselben. Pollichia, Ibid. p. 24. 
— -Berichtigung der Irrthiimer,welche im Pllanzen-verzeichnisse 
des “Prodromus topographiae medicae Weissenburgensis auct. 
P. F. Buchholtz ” enthalten sind. Ibid. p. 63. 
--=*— Ueber das “ Herbarium normale ” von (anon.) Ibid. p. 74. 
-- Botanisch-geologische Beise ins INTahethal. Ibid. p. 128. 
Schultz, F.—Zusatze und Berichtigungen zu meiner Flora der 
Pfalz. Poll, xviii. xix. p. 75. 
■—--Diagnosis novae speciei Cerastii generis. Flora, 1862, p. 
458. 
— - Ueber Gagea andegavensis und Potentilla Bogenhardiana. 
Ibid. p. 459. 
-—— Ueber Melica Glauca und Sehistostega. Ibid. p. 461. 
Schultz - Schultzenstein. —Vortrage uber die Entstehungsge- 
schichte der Lebenssaftgefasse. Flora, 1862, p. 83. Various 
reasons are given to show that laticiferous ‘ vessels ’ do not ori¬ 
ginate from rows of cells, or from any metamorphosis of cells. 
Schweihfurth, G.—Plantae quaedam niloticae quas in itinere cum 
divo Adalberto libero Barone de Barnim facto collegit B. Hart¬ 
mann. Berol. 1862. 4to. pp. 53. tabb. 16. No new genera are 
described. Principally an enumeration of species, with localities. 
Seehaus, C.-—1st die Eibe ein norddeutscher Baum P Bot. Zeit. 
1862, p. 33. On the nativity of the Yew in North Germany. 
Seemahn, B.—On Manburia , a Cucurbitaceous Genus from Mexico. 
. A. N. H. ser. iii. ix. p. 9. With an emended character of the 
genus. 
-On Antiaris Bennettii , a new species of Upas Tree, from 
Polynesia. Ibid. p. 405. Description of the plant figured in 
‘ Bonplandia,’ 1862, t. 7. 
--Bemarks on the Natural Order Bignoniaceae. A. N. H. 
ser. iii. ix. p. 192. In reply to Mr. Miers’ criticisms, and vindi¬ 
cating the “ integrity of the Crescentiaceae,” as circumscribed 
in the author’s synopsis. 
-Note on the Belationship of Cannabinaceae. Ibid. p. 199. 
Suggesting an affinity with Malpighiaceae and Acerineae, es¬ 
pecially the former. 
--— Bevision of the Natural Order Bignoniaceae. A. N. H. 
3rd. ser. x. 29. Embracing a list of the genera, grouped under 
