278 
Letters, Announcements, fyc. 
daert called it P. speciosa. Ought not the credit of having 
named D. guglielmi-tertii to be given to Van Musschenbroek, 
as is done by Meyer himself ? 
I remain, 
Yours very truly, 
T. Salvadori. 
Northrepps, 13th March, 1876. 
Sir, —In the late Mr. Blyth’s valuable f Catalogue of Mam¬ 
mals and Birds of Burma/ recently published by the Asiatic 
Society of Bengal, the ornithological portion of which is 
edited and enriched with notes by Viscount Walden, the fol¬ 
lowing editorial note occurs at page 62, under the head of 
Accipiter virgatus :— “ Thayet Myo (F.) . Captain Feilden 
was good enough to send me the example here noted, and 
which I provisionally identify with A. virgatus. In Mr. 
Sharpens opinion it may belong to the race named A. steven- 
soni by Mr. Gurney; the latter gentleman, however, as will 
be seen below, identified, though with doubt, this Thayet-. 
Myo example as belonging to c A. rhodogaster, nearly adult/ ” 
Through the kindness of Lord Walden I have had a second 
opportunity of examining this specimen; and having since I 
first saw it, some years since, become better acquainted with 
the variations of plumage incident to A. virgatus, I am now 
able to state decidedly that it is a male of that species in the 
second or intermediate plumage, described by me in f The 
Ibis ’ for 1875, p. 480. I was quite wrong in supposing that 
it might be an example of A. rhodogaster; and it is equally a 
mistake to refer it to A. stevensoni . I may add that this 
specimen precisely agrees with one from India which is pre¬ 
served in the Norwich Museum. 
I wish also to mention that through the kindness of Pro¬ 
fessor Newton, and of his brother Mr. Edward Newton, I 
have had an opportunity of examining a specimen of Circus 
macroscelus lately received by the latter gentleman from Ma¬ 
dagascar. The sex of this individual has not been recorded; 
but as its dimensions somewhat exceed those of the type speei- 
