170 
Mycologia 
In Lindau and Sydow’s Thesaurus litteraturae mycologicae 
. . . under J. A. Mougeot (no. 77) occurs the title: Champig- 
nons des Vosges (Statist. du Depart. des Vosges, Epinal 1845, 
127 p.) ; the same title is also given under A. Mougeot, by Tra- 
verso in his Supplementum alterum to Saccardo’s Bibliotheca 
mycologicae ... in the Sylloge fungorum, v. 17, p. lxxii. I 
have not been able to locate this work but I feel reasonably sure 
that it is wrongly credited to J. A. Mougeot. There seems to 
have been considerable confusion of the father (Jean Baptiste) 
and the son (Joseph Antoine or Antoine, as he is more often) 
given) by bibliographers. A notable example is that of the 
Royal Society’s Catalogue of scientific papers, ist series, which, 
however, corrected the mistake in the supplementary volume. 
There is no mention of any such work by J. A. Mougeot by his 
biographers; in fact it would not seem that his published myco- 
logical work dates so far back. It is most probably a reprint 
from J. B. MougeoCs Considerations generales sur la vegetation 
spontanee du departement des Vosges. This was first published 
in the Ann. Soc. Emul. Dep. Vosges in 1834 (Lindau no. 73), 
but according to Kirschleger in his Flore d’Alsace, v. 2, p. 
lxx-lxxi, included only the phanerogams ; in 1845 it was reprinted 
with the addition of the cryptogams, in Lepage and ChartoiVs 
Statistique du Departement des Vosges (Lindau, no. 73a, the 
date 1835 must be a typographical error). An examination of 
a copy of the reprint of the Considerations generales . . . of 
1845, discovers no indication that the son (J. A. Mougeot) had 
any hand in the work. The part dealing with fungi, both general 
text and the table of species, would cover about 127 p., which is 
given as the number of pages for the reprint “ Champignons des 
Vosges.” 
Nos. 78 and 79, credited by Lindau to J. A. Mougeot, should 
also be transferred to J. B. Mougeot, the father. 
I should be glad to get track of a copy of the “ Champignons 
des Vosges,” 1845, and*would appreciate information in regard 
to its location. 
It is very possible that the following note of correction for 
Saccardo’s “ Sylloge fungorum ” has already been brought to the 
