1884.] J. Beanies —On the Geography of India in the Reign of Akhar. 221 
11. Rasiilpur and Ghansi. 2 mahals. 4,200&. 622,030(1 Sombansis. 
500 foot. 
12. Bamgarh and Gauri. 2 mabals. 10,7266. 485,943d. Somban- 
sis. Included in Binaikpur. 
13. Gorakhpur ba haveli. Has a fort of burnt brick, on]the banks 
of the river Rapti. 12,6566. 567,385d. 
39105. Surajbansis. 40 horse, 200 foot. 
14. Katihla. Fort of burnt brick. 9006. 126. 40,000d. Bisens. 
30u horse, 200. foot. 
15. Kihlaparah. Fort of burnt brick. 16,0126. 425,845d. Bansis 
(?) 20 horse, 300 foot. 
16. Mahauli. Fort of burnt brick. 2,5236. 617,256d. Bisens. 2000 
foot. 
17. Mandwah. 1,9096. 196. 452,321d. Sombansis. 20 horse, 500 
foot. 
18. Mandlah. 1,2526. 66. 51,100d. 
19. Maghar and Ratanpur. 2 mahals. Fort of burnt brick. 26,0626. 
l,352,585d. 16,7715. Bisen and Bais. 2000 
foot. 
The above list is taken from the Persian text, and differs in some 
particulars from Elliot’s (Races of H. W. P. Vol. II, p. 119). It also 
gives the area and revenue and other details omitted by Elliot. The fol¬ 
lowing remarks are necessary for its elucidation. 
1. Atraula. The correct name is Utraula or perhaps strictly Utta- 
raula. Akbar’s parganah includes the modern parganahs of Utraula, 
Sadullahnagar and Biirhaparah on the eastern frontier of the Gonda 
district (Gonda S. R. p. 11, O. G. s. r. Utraula, iii. 574). 
8. Daryaparah is the spelling in the text and no variants are given 
by Blochmann. The parganah which is still extant is, however, now called 
Uhuriaparah. In the map I have given the name as it is in the Persian 
text, which of course might also read Duryaparah as no vowels are given, 
9. Dewaparah and Kotlah. So in the text, but Kotlah is an 
easy and probable mistake for Kohanah The real name appears 
to be Dewaparah Kuhanah which I have shewn on the map after Elliot’s 
explanation. It covers all the east of the Gorakhpur district. 
10. Rihli comprises the northern parganahs of Mankapur, Maha- 
dewa and Hawabganj. Probably, as suggested under Amorha in Sarkar 
Audh, a portion of Hawabganj belonged to that parganah. See Gonda 
S. R. p. 11. 
12. Ramgarh and Gauri appear to have included all the forest tract 
north of the Rapti, the northern parganahs of Balrampur and Tulsipur. 
15. Kihlaparah may be, as Elliot suggests, a mistake for Rihlaj^arah, 
