1885.] 
the Sultans of Kashmir. 
95 
Margin. 
Unintelligible and not 
given. 
Not given but date same 
Reverse in 
scalloped 
lozenge. 
j 
+o 
do. 
Obverse. 
No. 
jM^ yM 29 
jJU 30 
as on 
00 
CM 
O*i£.’ /0 
M 
do. 
2$ (..Cu j <0.xa. 
^yJaLO) 
31 
A VP 
. r • A » 
*» , « 
do. 
32 
APP 
♦ 
A \ e <•-<*> ,$ 
JsX 
»*. x 
33 
iS)^* 
SAV 
do. 
•joJf j.A*2.i 
84 
is) 1 * 
8 1 ^ b 
^ j >0 jijd <)<? r 
do. 
'Osh s-K 
s- 
35 
Lfj 1 * 
sU^b 
v» 
do. 
^.Lc Ij OJ 
M 
e;Lkl/^jj 
36 
AjUO«J j 
(?) 
C| fr e 
Same as 
35. 
same as 
35. 
same as 35. 
37 
» 
do. 
iSJ 1 ’ 
w ^ 
38 
Cv/^3 Al « 
( ? ) 1 
j 4 >.aO A. 1 * j.Uj 
f • 
r Af\ Os+S* 3 
Vf 
39 
_>* pv 
40 
O’ 
&Uf t 
* > • 
C5f* ( 
J ^ LSJ 
«» 
-v« yy ^ 
41 
OI 
do. do, ^ * j8 J 42 
* ♦» ^ ^ 
Coins Nos. 39 and 40 are copper.. They are given to illustrate remarks 
made in the course of this essay on the silver coins of the Sultans. 
They are both of them new to numismatists not having yet been, published. 
No. 40 is exceedingly rare. I have only seen one other like it. 
There are several points calling for notice in the above list of coins 
(1) On some coins the dates are given in two ways in figures and in 
words. Some have only the words. (2) In some cases the date is in 
Arabic words in others in Persian. (3) The same date,— viz., 842 
appears in Arabic words on the margins of coins which either possess 
M 
