©0 C. J. Rodgers— Coins Supplementary of the Pathdn Kings. [No. 1, 
No. 32. Obverse :—Same as in 31. 
Margin :— ! L5 -'* jL» Asy yj ^jlTj 
Reverse as in No. 31 
No. 33. Obverse as in No. 31. 
Margin :— city o.*s (Jl«j 
Reverse as in No. 31. 
No. 34. Same as No. 33, but with mint in the margin iltyfa 
No. 35. Same as No. 33, but with mint in the margin simply? 
without the title %'t 
Tlie inscriptions on the above coins mostly tell the story of each. It 
may be as well perhaps to direct attention to the peculiarities which led me 
to figure them. 
Plate IV, No. 1 is to me a new coin. I have seen several of Ilduz of 
this type. Indeed No 2 is one of that general’s. As there are in existence 
coins of ’Ala-ud-din Khwarizmi of this type, I judge them to be of the same 
mint, Kirinan. 
No. 3 I attribute to Mu’izz-ud-din bin Sam. The peculiar lozenge on 
either side is unique. 
No. 4 is a new type of the some sovereign’s mintage. 
No. 5 is still another new type of the same king’s. 
No. 6 is a large gold coin. The one in the British Museum weighs 
320 grs. The inscriptions are identical but are not distributed exactly as 
on that coin. Again this one has a pellet in the middle of the lines form¬ 
ing the squares. It weighs 14G'6 grs. only. I obtained it at.Lahore after 
the last Afghan war from a merchant. 
No. 7 is one from Dr. Stulpnagel’s find. The one edited by him of 
this kind was double struck. This one gives the names of the two bro¬ 
thers plainly. 
No. 8 is a beautiful coin of ’Ala-ud-din Khwarizmi struck at Fanvan. 
No. 9 is a similar one struck at Gazni. (In the India office collection 
are two drawers full of gold coins of this sovereign. This collection is 
now in the British Museum, and it will be thoroughly examined and catalo¬ 
gued. Let us hope that of the numerous duplicates some will find their way 
back to the shores whence they were taken. This India office collection shows 
how utterly useless a collection of valuable things may become. There is 
no catalogue of it, and no interpreter. No one knows as yet what may or 
may not be in it. Had it stayed in India, native students of history might 
have obtained much information from it. And 1 hold that the more in¬ 
formation, just and accurate, a native of India obtains of former rulers and 
governments, the more loyal will he be towards the present most righteous 
rule of India.) 
No. 10 is a new type ii small silver of ’Ala-ud-din Khwarizmi. It 
