62 C. J. Rodgers— Coins Supplementary of the Pathdn Kings. [No. 1, 
No. 26 is a fine gold mohur of Jalal-ud-din Firuz. It has the mar¬ 
gin on both sides, as has also the rupee of his which I have figured No. 28. 
Both these coins are drawn simply to illustrate this fact of their possess¬ 
ing two margins. Mr. Thomas says of his No. 121, that the obverse occu¬ 
pies “ the entire surface of the coin.” He gives only the margin on the 
reverse. All the other rupees I have are like this one of Mr. Thomas. 
But for all that, I believe the dies had marginal legends. The mohur No. 
26 is in remarkably good condition, and the inscriptions come out as 
plainly as those on the rupees. From this I infer that not only does it 
hear the name of Dehli but that it was also struck there. 
No. 27 is one of those little damris that no one would think of 
picking up. But it bears the dreaded name of Taimur and it was struck 
at the capital of his Indian conquests Dehli. So far as I know it is 
unique. 
No. 29. The inscriptions on this coin are given by Thomas. But his 
was of fine silver, and as he did not figure it, I thought it right to do so. 
See footnote, p. 213 of his work. 
No. 30. This is quite a new type of the coins of Bahlol Lodi. Tho¬ 
mas gives 5 types of this king’s coins. This is th q fourth new type I 
have discovered. 
Nos. 31 to 35 are five coins of Muhammad Tughlaq. The mints are 
new in this type being Lakhnauti, Tughlaqpur, Satgaon, Dar ul Islam and 
Dehli. This type (it is No. 195 in Thomas) rejoices now in seven mints ; 
the five o-iven here and the Daulatabdd and TaJchtgdh i Delhi ones edited 
by Thomas. Tughlaqpur is new to history. The title Ildim as applied to 
a town is not new on coins. These five coins were found amongst thou¬ 
sands in Dehli and Jagadri. They are the results of many hours of weary 
hunting under a hot sun. The Daulatabad type of this coin is very rare 
in the Panjab. But the gold coin struck at Deogir I have seen several of 
both 728 and 727 A. H. (Thomas, No. 174.) 
Of all the coins here edited No. 19 is the most important. I have 
upwards of twenty of the bilingual coins of this king. They all, with the 
exception of this coin, have a small badly drawn outline of a horse in the 
centre round which the Arabic marginal legend runs. In the case of this 
coin, however, we have the name of the mint instead of the horse—Gazni. 
Now up to the present all the notice we had of this ruler was a statement 
that he was a ruler of Sind. His father had ruled in Gazni and Kirman. 
This coin gives us evidence of his rule in his father’s dominions. As I 
have seen some thousands of Gazni coins and have only seen this one of 
this ruler, I judge that he reigned but a short time in Gazni. The coins 
with the horse are common, but no two coins seem to be from the same 
die. Hence we may infer that in his seat of government, wherever it was, 
