1883.] A. F. Rudolf Hoernle —A new find of Muhammadan Coins 219 
on the reverse to be the same as on Col. Hyde’s coin ( i. e., the same as 
on No. 1 of the present series); hut this is clearly an error; for his coin 
shows distinctly the word and on my coins both words (*&«! 
and can be made out. But it should be noted that the inscrip¬ 
tion is distributed over area and margin, as in No. 8, thus : 
in margin in area 
r - A -^ ( - A -\ 
<Xj ik.!.w] j A$Xc oJX j £, yZ i kjli 
No. 10. (Plate XVII, fig. 10). One specimen; similar to No. 9, but 
the lettered surface of the obverse is ornamented with elongated strokes. 
Both legends are the same as on No. 9, but the reverse legend is differently 
distributed over area and margin, <*£Lc AlJ| being in the area, and 
the rest in the margin. This coin is evidently a duplicate of coin, No. 3, 
published by Blochmann, in J. A. S. B., Vol. XLIV, p. 288 (fig. 4 on his 
Plate). On the present specimen, the word Mujahid is quite distinct, while 
Blochmann’s coin supplies the date (852) which is illegible on mine. 
No. 11. (Plate XVII, fig. 11). One specimen ; a broad thin piece, 
in general appearance like No. 3, but with different ornaments on the 
margins, and a different legend on the reverse area. The latter is the 
same as on No. 1, while the legend of No. 3 is the same as on No. 2. 
Unfortunately the date is illegible. 
VI. Ruknu-d-din Barbae Shah. 
(a). Mujahid Type. 
No. 12. (Plate XVII, fig. 12). Two specimens ; broad, thin pieces, 
with lettered surfaces only ; the legends being : 
Ohv. yl y UalvJl aliiojb ^oll j LioJ| ^LLLJl 
Rev. AVP AiJ| b+s:' 0 aIJ| 211 <5Jt 2/ 
Dates of both, 874. 
(b). Muza-far Type. 
No. 13. (Plate XVII, figs. 13« and 135). Eleven specimens ; in gen¬ 
eral appearance like No. 11 ; large thin pieces, with two areas and two 
broad ornamented margins. The legends on the areas are: 
Olv. ^jI ^UaLJt jjli&jlj y\ j IfioJf 
Rev. The same as on Nos. 1 and 11. 
