JURISPRUDENCE. 
Why then deny it to the American Veterinary College; to one 
whose faculty has worked hard and earnestly for thirteen years; 
whose alumni are spread all over our continent, and endeavoring, 
by their efforts and their labors, to keep the work undertaken by 
their alma mater. 
VETERINARY JURISPRUDENCE. 
Read before the Montreal Veterinary Medical Association , by D. 
McEachran, F.R.C.V.S ., President. 
Continued from Page 437, Vol. I. 
WARRANTY. 
Before noticing the diseases which are considered to be unsound, 
I will briefly notice the laws relating to sale and warranty. In 
England, a purchaser has no case unless he has a warranty, or 
unless fraud can be proved on the part of the seller. 
“ By the civil law every person is bound to warrant the thing 
he sells, or conveys, although there is no express warranty; but 
the common law binds him not, unless there be a warranty either 
in deed or in law, for caveat emptor; the meaning of this Latin 
expression is that the buyer takes the article sold with all its de¬ 
fects, and must not look to the law for any defects if its intrinsic 
worth does not correspond with its outward appearance. It cau¬ 
tions the buyer, therefore, according to the Italian proverb, that 
he lias need of a hundred eyes, the seller of only one. By the 
law of England, warranties are divided into express and implied; 
the latter, however, differ in no respect from the former, except 
in the circumstance of proof. The intention to warrant is col¬ 
lected from the whole tissue of circumstances proved, as a legiti¬ 
mate deduction from them, like the presumption of any other 
part not established by direct evidence; while the express 
warranty is proved by direct and express testimony to the fact 
