16 
DAVID I. CARTWRIGHT 
Larvae for life history determinations were 
examined under a stereomicroscope at x 50 
magnification; headwidth (to the nearest 0.02 
mm) was measured. Larvae and pupae were col¬ 
lected by hand in order to rear adults for identi¬ 
fication and to obtain information on the larval 
capture net. Capture net dimensions were meas¬ 
ured using a compound microscope at x 1000 
magnification. Female genitalia were drawn 
from cleared specimens, macerated in 10% 
KOH and transferred to glycerol for drawing. 
Figs 1-11. Larvae of Chimarra Stevens. 1-9, Chimarra monticola Kimmins. 1, whole animal, scale = 0.5mm - f;; 
foreleg, scale = 0.2 mm. 3, midleg, scale = 0.2 mm. 4, hindleg, scale = 0.2 mm. 5, tarsus of foreleg, detail of ($ 
ventral seta, scale = 0.05 mm. 6, head including Iabrum, dorsal view, scale = 0.2 mm. 7, head, ventral view,scale : . 
= 0.2 mm. 8, anterior margin of frontoclypeal apotome, dorsal view, scale = 0.1 mm. 9, mandibles, ventral view. seal; 
scale = 0.1 mm. 10-11, Chimarra australica (Ulmer). 10, anterior margin of frontoclypeal apotome, dorsal view ^ 
scale = 0.1 mm. 11, mandibles, ventral view, scale = 0.1 mm. 
