The Presidential Address. 
73 
Hooker and Sir Charles Lyell, by the latter of whom it was 
communicated to the Linnean Society, and was published in 
the ‘Proceedings’ for August, 1858. 7 At the same meeting 
of the Society Mr. Darwin gave an outline- of his theory, and 
his paper appeared at the same time as Wallace’s. The 
slight sketch published by Darwin in 1858 was elaborated the 
following year into his epoch-making work on the ‘ Origin of 
Species,’ the first edition of which was published on November 
24tli, 1859. On learning that Darwin had for more than 
twenty years been accumulating facts which had led him to 
the same conclusions, Wallace with the greatest generosity 
relinquished his claim in favour of his great compeer. 8 In 
these days, when we hear of petty squabbles about the 
“ priority” of claim for having attached a label to some new 
insect, the following remarks from the Preface to Wallace’s 
‘Contributions to the Theory of Natural Selection’ (1870) 
read with refreshing magnanimity:—“ The present work will, 
I venture to think, prove that I both saw at the time the 
value and scope of the law which I had discovered, and have 
since been able to apply it to some purpose in a few original 
lines of investigation. But here my claims cease. I have 
felt all my life, and I still feel, the most sincere satisfaction that 
Mr. Darwin had been at work long before me, and that it was 
not left for me to attempt to write the ‘ Origin of Species.’ 
I have long since measured my own strength, and know well 
that it would be quite unequal to that task. Par abler men 
than myself may confess that they have not that untiring 
patience in accumulating, and that wonderful skill in using 
large masses of facts of the most varied kind,—that wide and 
accurate physiological knowledge,—that acuteness in devising 
and skill in carrying out experiments,—and that admirable 
style of composition, at once clear, persuasive, and judicial,— 
7 Mr. Wallace has narrated to me that one of his correspondents, a 
well known entomologist, wrote to say that it was a general remark in 
natural history circles, with respect to this paper, that it was much to be 
regretted that the author had not more confined himself to statements 
of fact! 
8 Lyell states that Darwin was also “willing to waive his claim to 
priority.” ‘Principles of Geology,’ 12th ed., vol. ii., p. 278. 
