Genus Gellia. 
69 
Cellia pharoensis. Theobald (1901). 
Anopheles pharoensis. Theobald (1901). 
Cellia olbofimbriata. Giles (1904). 
Mono. Oulicid. I*' 169 (1991); in., 109 (1903); TV., 106 (1907), Theobald; 
Anns. Trop. Med. and Parasit. I., No. 1, 10 (1907), Newstead. 
Egypt, Mashonaland, • Zomba, Sudan and Nile Provinces, 
Gambia, Ismailia, Suez Canal, Madagascar. 
Additional localities.— Boma, Congo Free State (Newstead); 
Delagoa Bay, 2 5’s (Jose F. Sant -Anna). 
Observations. —At Boma the larvae were found amongst water- 
grasses growing along river edges, in swamps and in a dirty 
muddy puddle, and specimens were caught in dwelling-places. 
Giles 5 Cellia olbofimbriata , Rev. Anop. 1st Supp. 45, 3(1904), 
is only a variety of pharoensis. 
Economic importance. — Malarial parasites were seen to 
develop in this insect at Boma. 
Type in the British Museum. 
Cellia bigotii. Theobald (1901). 
Mono. Oulicid. I., 135 (1901). 
Chili. 
Type in the British Museum. 
Cellia all i man a. Wiedemann (1821). 
Anopheles cubensis. Agramonte (1900). 
Anopheles albipes. sub. sp. Theobald (1901). 
Cellia albipes. Theobald (1903). 
Anopheles tarsimaeulatus. Goeldi (1905).* 
Dipt. Exot, I „ 10 (1821), Wiedemann; Mono. Oulicid. I., 125 (1901); 
III., 110 (1903); IV., 106 (1907), Theobald. 
Jamaica, Antigua, Dominica, St. Lucia, St. Vincent, Grenada, 
Cuba, Cairiacore (one of the Grenadine Islands), Trinidad, British 
Guiana, Brazil, India, j 
Giles recorded it from India. It does not seem to occur there. 
* Dyar and Knab say regarding tarsimaeulatus as follows: “The 
specimens from Para are, however, not properly referable to albimanus, 
Wied., nor to argyrotarsis , Rob. Desv. Goeldi’s name may therefore be 
used for this form.” The only answer to give is that all the long series 
sent me by Professor Goeldi from Para are the same as those received 
from many other places, and are undoubtedly alhimana. 
t This is evidently an error, as it ^is a marked S. American and West 
Indian species. 
