486 
A Monograph of Culiciclae. 
Blanchard (my Culex flavescens described from the Hopeian 
collection) is a complete error. There is no connection between 
flavescens , or rather arcanus, and an Aedes whatsoever. The 
authors say : “ We think it may be safely identified with this 
species ( fietcheri ’).” 
2. Aedes quadrivittatus. Coquillett. 
Culex quadrivittatus. Coquillett. 
Dyar and Knab say on examining the types that Coquillett’s 
species is an Aedes. Mr. Coquillett, they say, “ described it origin¬ 
ally in comparison with Aedes atropalpus, Coq., with which it 
has no affinity, thus producing a misleading impression.” 
Genus MICRAEDES. Coquillett (1906). 
Proc. Ent. Soc. Wash. III., 4, 185 (1906). 
Near Aedes, but the palpi longer, about one-third the length 
of the proboscis. Scales as in Aedes. 
Micraedes bisulcatus. Coquillett (1906). 
Proc. Ent. Soc. Wash. VII., 4, 185 (1906). 
Guadeloupe and Santo Domingo, West Indies. 
Type in U.S. National Museum. 
Genus AEDEOMYIA. Theobald (1901). 
Mono. Gnlicid. II., 806 (1901). 
Two species have been described in this genus :— 
A. Legs ringed with white, apices of central 
femora with dark scale tufts. squammipenna. Arribalzaga. 
AA. Legs unhanded, all dark; no apical 
scale tufts to mid legs..... americana. Neveu-Lemaire, 
