Buniliam: Measures of Proper Motion Stars 
5076. 
, Hn 98. (9.8. 
..9.8) 
R. A. 9" 
i8 m 56 s Decl. - 
-23 0 17' 
1907.137 
I 73°6 
2 "82 
9.170 
172.1 
3 -11 
1908.15 
172.8 
2.96 
5082. 
Arg. 22. (9.4. 
•. 9 . 5 ) 
R. A. 9" 
I9 m 45 s Decl. 
-23 0 6' 
1907.137 
9 S ?9 
23-52 
7.197 
98.0 
23.68 
9.170 
97-7 
23-55 
1907-83 
98.2 
23-58 
No other measures. 
5084. H. C. Wilson 7. 
R. A. 9 h 2o' n ± Decl. — 23 0 10' ± 
This was searched for in observing No. 5076, but nothing 
found near the rough place given by Wilson agreeing with 
the description. 
5090. 41 Lyncis. S 598. ( 5 . 7 ... 7 .S) 
R. A. 9 h 20 m 48 s Decl. + 46° 8' 
A and C (10.4) 
1908.997 
79 ° 53 
82799 
9-093 
79.83 
83.63 
9.109 
79-37 
8325 
9.128 
79-63 
83.42 
1909.08 
79-59 
83-32 
We have the following earlier positions of C: 
1879.62 80?57 
83 "39 
2n 
B1 
1888.30 80.60 
83-58 
2n 
Eng 
1893.19 80.70 
83-51 
Donner. 
The last is from the Astro 
graphic Catalogue. 
The microm- 
eter positions give for the proper motion of 41 Lyncis: 
o'.'o6o in i86?7 
It will be noted that this value derived from the measures 
of a faint star is practically the same as that found from sixty 
years’ measures of AB, and implies that the meridian proper 
motion of A is much too large. 
Measures 
of AB o"o87 
in 178? 3 
Auwers 
0.133 
in 187.3 
Porter 
0.138 
in 192.6 
Boss 
0.136 
in 181.3 
5093. 
2 1349- ( 6 . 8 .. 
..8.0) 
R. A. 9” 
2o m 58 s Decl. + 68° 4' 
1907.140 
i64?8 
1 9 "43 
8.227 
164.7 
18.85 
8.249 
164.S 
19.07 
1907.87 
164.7 
19.12 
No recent measures. Fixed. 
5104. 23 Ursae Maj. 2 1351. 
(3.8...9.0) 
R. A. 9 h 22 m 3 
I s Decl. + 63° 35 ' 
A and C (10.5) 
1908.766 
227 ?94 
93 " 5 i 
.769 
227.88 
93-26 
.788 
228.40 
93-07 
.826 
227.65 
93-34 
1908.79 
227.97 
93-29 
Prior measures for comparison are : 
1886.39 227?33 
9o'.'6o 
in 
Eng. 
1894.40 227.87 
92.32 
in 
Eng. 
The three positions give 
for the proper motion of 23 Ursae 
Maj.: 
o'.'105 in 65 ?5 
Ball has two measures in 
1879, but as 
the distances differ by 
more than 1", they are not used in the computation. 
No change 
in AB. 
Auwers 
0" 104 in 
75°5 
Boss 
0.117 in 
77.6 
5113. 7 Lconis 
Min. H 1166. 
(6.0...9.3) 
R. A. 9" 23"’ 28 s Decl. + 34 0 11' 
1911-950 
I 29°33 
62 "83 
12.007 
128.88 
62.87 
12.046 
129.30 
62.55 
1912.00 
129.17 
62.75 
There is no sensible change since 1876. Herschel’s distance 
in 1783 is much too small. 
The proper motion of A is given: 
Auwers 
o'.'o57 in 
206? 0 
Boss 
0.065 in 
186.5 
As these stars appear 
to have a common proper motion, I 
have connected a third for future confirmation of this move- 
ment. 
A and C (9.8) 
I 9 II .950 
2 i 3°33 
97 "82 
12.007 
213.05 
97.85 
12.046 
213.07 
97.70 
1912.00 
213-15 
97-79 
5116. 2 
1360. (7.4...7.7) 
R. A. 9 h 24"' 
10 s Decl. + n° 8' 
A and B 
1910.164 
243?1 14-45 
. 167 
242.7 14.31 
.184 
243.2 14.42 
1910.17 
243.0 14.39 
The proper motions of the large stars are given 
A = o'! 222 
in 262?4 Bossert 
0.228 
in 261.7 Glasgow 
B = 0.246 
in 243.5 Bossert 
0.251 
in 243.8 Glasgow 
166 
