TABLE D-3. —Proportion of their observed kill hunters reported by means of wing 
envelopes 1961-62, 1962-63, and 1963-64 combined 
Birds bagged 
per hunter 
Observed number of 
,Birds 
bagged 
Blinds reoortine 
Proportion of their kill 
reported by hunters 
Hunters/blind 
Blinds 
Number 
Percent 
Number 
Percent 
1 
31 
31 
22 
70 
19 
61 
2 
106 
155 
65 
61 
84 
54 
0.1-1.0 
3 
32 
72 
17 
53 
32 
44 
4 
7 
20 
5 
71 
13 
65 
5 
4 
19 
2 
50 
13 
68 
6 
4 
10 
3 
75 
7 
70 
Subtotal- 
184 
307 
114 
62 
168 
55 
1 
33 
64 
23 
70 
38 
59 
2 
77 
268 
58 
75 
154 
58 
1.1-2.0 
3 
19 
97 
14 
74 
60 
62 
4 
10 
67 
7 
70 
42 
63 
5 
5 
40 
4 
80 
23 
58 
6 
3 
26 
3 
100 
10 
39 
Subtotal- 
147 
562 
109 
74 
327 
58 
1 
36 
137 
28 
78 
87 
64 
2 
53 
375 
40 
75 
234 
62 
2.1-6.0 
3 
12 
103 
11 
92 
66 
64 
4 
6 
65 
6 
100 
30 
46 
5 
6 
1 
14 
1 
100 
11 
79 
Subtotal- 
108 
694 
86 
80 
428 
62 
Total- 
439 
1563 
309 
70 
923 
59 
TABLE D-4. —Summary of shots fired, ducks bagged and crippling, loss by regions, and 
Flyways 1961-62, 1962-63, and 1963-64, data combined 
Number of ducks 
Number per 100 shots 
Shots per 
bird 
Cripples 
per 
bird 
bagged 
Shots 
fired 
Knocked 
down 
Sailers 
Hits 
Bagged 
Knocked 
down 
Sailers 
Hits 
Bagged 
Hits 
Bagged 
Regions: 
1- 
2,050 
438 
192 
630 
416 
21.4 
9.4 
30.7 
20.3 
3.25 
4.93 
0. 51 
2- 
1,668 
286 
77 
363 
240 
17.1 
4.6 
21.8 
14.4 
4. 60 
6. 95 
0.51 
3- 
2,344 
394 
121 
515 
344 
16.8 
5.2 
22.0 
14.7 
4. 55 
6.81 
0. 50 
4- 
2,388 
502 
151 
653 
455 
21.0 
6.3 
27.3 
19.1 
3.66 
5.25 
0.44 
5 - 
1,822 
364 
69 
433 
315 
20.0 
3.8 
23.8 
17.3 
4.21 
5. 78 
0.37 
Flyways: 
Pacific— 
2,403 
522 
195 
717 
473 
21.7 
8.1 
29.8 
19,7 
3.35 
5.08 
0. 52 
Central— 
1,764 
286 
99 
385 
253 
16.2 
5.6 
21.8 
14.3 
4. 58 
6.97 
0.52 
Miss.- 
3,129 
553 
174 
728 
490 
17.7 
5.6 
23.3 
15.7 
4.30 
6. 39 
0.49 
Atlantic— 
2,976 
623 
142 
765 
554 
20.9 
4.8 
25.7 
18.6 
3.89 
5.37 
0.38 
Total- 
10,272 
1,984 
610 
2,595 
1,770 
19.3 
5.9 
25.3 
17.2 
3.96 
5.80 
0.47 
NOTE: Because of the limited nature and design of the sample, this material should not necessarily be con¬ 
sidered as representative of either Regions or Flyways. 
110 
