i*eb. 23,1924 
Teosinte Maize Hybrids 
549 
FIGURES 12 TO aa 
Fig. 12.—Rows in central spike; frequency distribution of plants in F 2 . Class value 
one row. Shaded portion represents plants classed as crinkly. 
Fig. 13.—Length of leaf; frequency distribution of plants in F 2 . Class value, 1 deci¬ 
meter. Shaded portion represents plants classed as crinkly. 
Fig. 14.—Width of leaf; frequency distribution of plants in F 2 . Class value, 1 cm. 
Shaded portion represents plants classed as crinkly. 
Fig. 15.—Width index; frequency distribution of plants in F 2 . Class value, 1 per 
cent. Shaded portion represents plants classed as crinkly. 
Fig, 16.—Length of sheath; frequency distribution of plants in F 2 . Class value, 1 
centimeter. Shaded portion represents plants classed as crinkly. 
Fig. 17.—Position of longest leaf; frequency distribution of plants in F 2 . Class value# 
one leaf. Shaded portion represents plants classed as crinkly. 
Fig. 18.—Leaves above best inflorescence; frequency distribution of plants in F 2 . 
Class value, one leaf. Shaded portion represents plants classed as crinkly. 
Fig. 19.—Leaves on best inflorescence; frequency distribution of plants in F 2 . Class 
value, one leaf. Shaded portion represents plants classed as crinkly. 
Fig. 20.—Length of best inflorescence; frequency distribution of plants in F 2 . Class 
value, 2 cm. Shaded portion represents plants classed as crinkly. 
Fig. 21.—Length of ear stalk of best inflorescence; frequency distribution of plants 
in F 2 . Class value, 5 cm. Shaded portion represents plants classed 
as crinkly. 
Fig. 22.—Length of female portion of best inflorescence; frequency distribution of 
plants in F 2 . Class value, 1 cm. Shaded portion represents plants 
classed as crinkly. 
