Feb. 23,1924 
Teosinte Maize Hybrids 
553 
FIGURES 34 TO 43 
Fig. 34.—Degree of crinkly leaves; frequency distribution of plants of F 2 . Class 
value, one grade. Shaded portion represents plants classed as crinkly. 
Fig. 35.—Degree of lobed leaves; frequency distribution of plants of F 2 . Class value, 
one grade. Shaded portion represents plants classed as crinkly. 
Fig. 36.—Degree of color of leaves; frequency distribution of plants of F 2 . Class 
value, one grade. Shaded portion represents plants classed as crinkly. 
Fig. 37.—Alicole index; frequency distribution of plants of F 2 . Class value, 10 
per cent. Shaded portion represents plants classed as crinkly. 
Fig. 38.—Central spike index; frequency distribution of plants of F 2 . Class value, 
5 per cent. Shaded portion represents plants classed as crinkly. 
Fig. 39.—Tassel branch index; frequency distribution of plants of F 2 . Class value, 
one grade. Shaded portion represents plants classed as crinkly. 
Fig. 40.—Degree of crinkly plus degree of lobing; frequency distribution of plants 
in F 2 . Class value, one grade. Biserial correlation with type of plant 
is 0.990 ± 0.018. Shaded portion represents plants classed as crinkly. 
Fig. 41.—Degree of crinkly plus degree of color; frequency distribution of plants in 
F 2 . Class value, one grade. Biserial correlation with type of plant is 
0.834 ± 0.032. Shaded portion represents plants classed as crinkly. 
Fig. 42.—Degree of lobing plus degree of color; frequency distribution of plants in 
F 2 .. Class value, one grade. Biserial correlation with type of plant is 
0.918 ± 0.030. Shaded portion represents plants classed as crinkly. 
Fig. 43.—Degree of crinkly plus degree of color plus degree of lobing; distribution 
of plants in F 2 . Class value, one grade. Biserial correlation with type 
of plant is 0.854 ± 0.032. Shaded portion represents plants classed as 
crinkly. 
74027—24 - 3 
