486 
Journal of Agricultural Research 
Vol. XXVI, No. 10 
questions likely to arise in connection with this homworm disease and 
this group of diseases in general. 
LITERATURE CITED 
(1) Garman, H. 
1897. NOTES ON TOBACCO WORMS, FROM OBSERVATIONS MADE IN 1896. In Ky. 
Agr. Exp. Sta. Bui. 66, p. 6-32, 4 fig. [pi.]. 
(2) Geaser, R. W. 
1918. A SYSTEMATIC STUDY OF THE ORGANISMS DISTRIBUTED UNDER THE NAME 
of coccobacieeus acridiorum d’herEEEE. In Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer., 
v. 11, p. 19-42. 
(3) Hereeee, E. d\ 
1911. SUR UNE ^PIZOOTIE DE NATURE BACT^RIENNE S&VISSANT SUR EES SAU- 
TEREEEES au MExiQUE. In Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. [Paris], t. 15a, 
p. 1413-1415. 
(4) Lovett, A. L. 
1915. The tomato worms. In 2d Bien. Crop Pest and Hort. Rpt., 1913-1914, 
Oreg. Agr. Exp. Sta., p. 170-172, fig. 38, pi. 7. 
(5) Reed, W. V. 
1915. SOME OF THE MORE IMPORTANT TRUCK CROP PESTS IN GEORGIA. Ga. 
State Bd. Ent. Bui. 41, 39 p., 29 fig. 
(6) Thaxter, Roland. 
i8qi. report of the mycoeogist. In Conn. Agr. Exp. Sta. Ann. Rpt., 1890, 
p. 80-113, illus., 4 pi. 
