604 
Journal of Agricultural Research 
Vol. XXVI, No. x* 
(27) Nestler, A. 
1898. ttBBR DIR DURCH WUNDREIZ BEWIRKTEN BEWEGUNGSERSCHEINUNGEN 
des zellkernes und des protoplasmas. In Sitzber. K. Akad. 
Wiss. [Vienna], Math. Naturw. Kl., Bd. 107, Abt. 1, p. 708-730, 1 pi. 
(28) Nilsson-Ehle, H. 
1911. kreuzungsuntersuchungen an hafer und weizen. 11. Lunds Univ. 
Arsskr., N. F., Afd. 2, Bd. 7, Nr. 6, 84 p. Bibliographical footnotes. 
(29) Parker, John H. 
1920. A PRELIMINARY STUDY OP THE INHERITANCE OF RUST RESISTANCE IN 
oats. In Jour. Amer. Soc. Agron., v. 12, p. 23-38, 2 pi. Literature 
cited, p. 37. 
(30) Puttick, G. F. 
1921. THE REACTION OF THE F 2 GENERATION OF A CROSS BETWEEN A COMMON 
AND A DURUM WHEAT TO TWO BIOLOGIC FORMS OF PUCCINIA GRAMINIS. 
In Phytopathology, v. 11, p. 205-213. Literature cited, p. 213. 
(31) Ritter, Gaston. 
1911. ttBBR TRAUMOTAXIS UND CHBMOTAXIS DES ZELLKERNES. In Ztschr. 
Bot., Jahrg. 3, p. 1-42. Literatur, p. 41-42. 
(32) Rosen, F. 
1893. BBITRAGE ZUR KBNNTNISS DER PFLANZENZELLEN. II. STUDIEN t)BER 
DIE KERNE UND DIE MEMBRANBILDUNG BEI MYXOMYCETEN UND PILZEN. 
In Beitr. Biol. Pflanz., Bd. 6, p. 237-266, pi. 2-3. 
(33) Sbifriz, William. 
1921. OBSERVATIONS ON SOME PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF PROTOPLASM BY AID 
OF microdissection. In Ann. Bot., v. 35, p. 269-296, illus. Bibli¬ 
ography, p. 294-296. 
(34) Smith, Grant. 
1900. THE HAUSTORIA OF THE BRYSIPHBAB. In Bot. Gaz., V. 29, p. 153-184, 
pi. 11—12. Bibliography, p. 181-183. 
(35) Stakman, E. C. 
1914. A STUDY IN CEREAL RUSTS: PHYSIOLOGICAL RACES. Minn. Agr. Exp. 
Sta. Bui. 138, 56 p., 9 pi. Bibliography, p. 50-54. 
(36) — 
1915. RELATION BETWEEN PUCCINIA GRAMINIS AND PLANTS HIGHLY RESISTANT 
to its attack. In Jour. Agr. Research, v. 4, p. 193-200, pi. 28. Lit¬ 
erature cited, p. 198-199. 
(37) -and Levine, M. N. 
1922. THE DETERMINATION OF BIOLOGIC FORMS OF PUCCINIA GRAMINIS ON 
Triticum spp. Minn. Agr. Exp. Sta. Tech. Bui. 8, 10 p., 1 fig. 
(38) -- and Leach, J. G. 
1919. new biologic forms of puccinia graminis. (Preliminary paper.) In 
Jour. Agr. Research, v. 16, p. 103-105. 
(39) - Parker, John H., and Piemeisel, F. J. 
1918. CAN BIOLOGIC FORMS OF STEMRUST ON WHEAT CHANGE RAPIDLY ENOUGH 
TO INTERFERE WITH BREEDING FOR RUST RESISTANCE? In Jour. Agr. 
Research, v. 14, p. m-124, pi. 13-17. Literature cited, p. 122-123. 
(40) -and Piemeisel, F. J. 
1917. a NEW strain OF puccinia graminis. (Abstract.) In Phytopathology, 
(41) 
V. 7 > P- 73 - 
1917. BIOLOGIC FORMS OF PUCCINIA GRAMINIS ON CEREALS AND GRASSES. In 
Jour. Agr. Research, v. 10, p. 429-496, pi. 53-59. Literature cited, 
p. 493-495. 
(42) -and Levine, M. N. 
1918. PLASTICITY OF BIOLOGIC FORMS OF PUCCINIA GRAMINIS. In Jour. Agr. 
Research, v. 15, p. 221-250, pi. 17-18. Literature cited, p. 248-249. 
(43) Waldron, L. R. 
1921. THE INHERITANCE OF RUST RESISTANCE IN A FAMILY DERIVED FROM A 
CROSS BETWEEN DURUM AND COMMON WHEAT. N. Dak. Agr. Exp. 
Sta. Bui. 147, 24 p., 2 fig. 
(44) Ward, H. Marshall. 
1904. ON THE HISTOLOGY OF UREDO DISPERSA, ERIKSS., AND THE “ MYCOPLASM” 
hypothesis. In Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, ser. B, v. 196, p. 
29-46, pi. 4-6 (1 col.). Bibliographical footnotes. 
(45) Waterhouse, W. L. 
1921. STUDIES IN THE PHYSIOLOGY OF PARASITISM. VII. INFECTION OF BER- 
BBRIS VULGARIS BY SPORIDIA OF PUCCINIA GRAMINIS. In Ann. Bot., 
V* 35 » P- 557-564, 19 fig- References, p. 563-564. 
