Errata. 
Yin 
Page 128, line 28 : for ‘ Panari * read 1 Panari.’ 
130, note 
131 
n 
132 
yy ' 
3 
4: 
5: 
1 
4 
7 
1 
2 
3 
5 
6 
7 
133, Zt7*e 
,, note 
134, line 29 
„ note 6 
135, line 2 
‘ note 168 ’ rea^ ‘ note 1 above.’ 
‘ page 23 ’ read ‘ p. 117.’ 
‘ note 169’ read ‘ note 2 above.* 
‘(1288 A.D.) * read ‘(1288 A.D.) j but this is of very 
doubtful authenticity.’ 
‘ note 151 * read * note 5, p. 127.’ 
‘ S. of Gwalior ’ read ‘ S. of Guna.* 
‘ p. 37,’ read ‘ p. 129.’ 
‘ note 180’ read ‘ note 8, p. 131.’ 
‘ note 152 ’ 
‘ note 137 ’ 
* Kali Dun * ,, ‘ Kala Dunr.’ 
,, ‘ note 2, p. 130.’ 
„ ‘ Banpur.’ 
‘ note 7, p. 125.’ 
„ ‘ note 6, p. 127.’ 
„ ‘ note 9, p. 125.’ 
yy 
‘ note 169 ’ 
‘ Banpur’ 
‘ note 135 ’ 
‘ Guduwal ’ 
>) 
>> 
‘ GudawaV 
Editor’s Note. 
To pp. 42 and 43 : — 
Mr. R. Burn has kindly pointed out to me that the coins of Dhruva Mitra and 
Rudra Gupta described on pp. 42 and 43, have already been published in Cunning¬ 
ham’s Coins of Ancient India, Plate VII, 1 and 2. 
To pp. 47-60 :— 
The peculiar transliteration and spelling of Oriental words adopted by Major 
Raverty in his paper on the Invention of Chess and Backgammon, pp. 47-60, has 
been retained at the author’s special request. 
Postscript to Mr. Theobald's paper ( Vol . LXX, Part I, No. 2 , p. 38,1901.) 
Since writing the above I have acquired a silver ‘ Purana ’ with the figure of a 
Rhinoceros on it. This animal will therefore remain on the list of animals on those 
coins. 
I find too that, by some inadvertence, the Rhinoceros has been excluded from 
the list of animals found on copper coins, though I had already figured it in my paper 
(J.A.S.B., 1890, Part I, p. 217, fig. 14), which figure was from a copper coin of tJjain. 
The Rhinoceros may therefore be inserted in the list on p. 71 as 55 A., that being 
its proper place among animals. 
