64 Wolseley Haig —Copper Coins in the Wun District , Barar. [Ho. 1, 
III. Ho. 3, pi. I, Ho. 8, pi. I and Ho. 22, pi. II are illustrations of 
what I believe to be specimens of the same coin. I am unable to 
give a satisfactory reading of the inscriptions. The words are 
legible on the obverse and on two specimens the name of the mint town 
( ) preceded apparently by appears on the reverse. After 
comparing these coins with other specimens in the collection of the 
Rev. H. B. Hyde I attribute them to Sultan ‘Abdu-‘llah Qutb Shah, 
the fifth Sultan of the Qutb Shahi dynasty. 
IV. Ho. 4, pi. I, is an illustration of a copper coin of Jahangir. 
On the obverse nothing but the Emperor’s title is legible. On the 
reverse what I take to be the name of the mint appears, but I am unable 
to decipher it. 
V. There are two Mu gh al copper coins of the Surat mint. One is 
of the same type as Hos. 67 and 68, pi. XVII, J.A.S.B., part I, 
Vol. LXIY. These coins, though illustrated, were not described by 
Mr. Rodgers. I do not know to which Emperor they are to be 
ascribed. 
YI. The next Surat coin is one of Shah Jahan, struck in the 
eleventh year of his reign. This coin is of the same type as Ho. 32, 
pi. XIY, J.A.S.B., part I, Yol. LXIY. I need not therefore illustrate it. 
VII. Ho. 5, pi. I, is a coin of Aurangzib ‘Alamglr I, struck at the 
Elicpur mint. The execution of the die of this coin is very rude. The 
“ teeth ” of the letter <j« are separated from one another, as is sometimes 
the case in the copper coins of the later Mughals. The date of the coin 
is A.H. 1114, and my reading of the inscriptions is as follows— 
V 
11 IF 
VIII, (1). Ho. 12, pi. I, is a dated coin of Aurangzib ‘Alamglr I, 
from the Elicpur mint. The date is A.H. 1112. There are three coins 
of this type. I have illustrated the best specimen. I read the inscrip¬ 
tions as follows— 
) U o* 
S ( A ^ l j 
H I r 
