68 Wolseley Haig —Copper Coins in the Wun District , Barar. [No. I, 
all from tlie Elicpur mint. These coins so much resemble those 
of Muhammad Shah that they can be distinguished from them only 
by the tail of the alif y the first letter of or by the £ in being 
unconnected with any previous letter. I have chosen the best specimen 
for illustration. The inscriptions are as follows— 
fcl& 
V 
JL>^I 
XII. There are 23 coins attributable either to Muhammad Shah 
or to Ahmad Shah. They are similar in type to Nos. 6, 7 and 13, 
pi. I, but bear no date. The inscriptions on these coins are incomplete 
and it is impossible to say to which reign they belong. The name is 
either or but it is impossible to say which. 
XIII. No. 16> pi. II, is an illustration of a dated coin of ‘Afclzu-d- 
dln ‘Alarngir II. There are four of these coins, all of the Elicpur 
mint. Two bear the date 1172 one bears the date 1173 and the unit 
in the date on the fourth is not clearly legible, but is either 2 or 3, 
The inscriptions are as follows— 
V ♦♦ 
! i vr 
sJ 
XIV. (1). No. 17, pi. II, is a dated coin of Shah ‘Alam II, minted at 
Elicpur. It bears on the reverse the figures 78, which I take to be the 
last two figures of the date 1178. 
The inscriptions are as follows— 
v A 
V 
( » 1 
(2). No. 21, pi. II, is a coin of Shah ‘Alamll, of the Elicpur mint. 
There are seven of these coins on which the year of the reign is legible 
and seventy-four coins] exactly similar to them in type, except that 
