Sultan 
Amir 
Taimur 
Sahib Qiran 
ibn Shah ‘Alam, 
Bahadur Shah, 
ibn 
Miran Shah, 
ibn ‘ Alamgi 
Badshah, 
ibn 
Sultan Mu^am 
mad Shah, 
Abul Huzaffar \ 
Mu’in-ud-dln 
im mad Barru^siya 
■i-‘Azim-ush-shan, 
Alim, Akbar Sam, 
yYala Shan / 
ibn 
Shah Jahan 
Badshah, 
Sultan 
Abu Sa £ Id Shah, 
ibn Jahangir 
Badshah, 
ibn 
Shekh_ 
‘IImr Shah, 
ibn Akbar 
Badshah, 
ibn 
Babar 
Badshah, 
ibn 
Humayun 
Badshah, 
358 W. Irvine —The Later Mughals. [No. 4, 
Bijapur (1), Haidarabad, 8 (Arkat 3, Adonl 1, Chlnapatan 3, Griiti 1). 
This distribution represents the facts fairly well: Kabul was practi¬ 
cally lost, but the absence of coins from Kashmir, Ajmer, Allahabad 
and two of the Dakhin Subahs, is difficult to account for. 
The square silver “legal drachma” or dirham-i-stiarati is a curi¬ 
ous coin, and to all appearance unique. By its weight it holds the pro¬ 
portion to a rupee of about one-fourth (exactly it is *23, or 3 annas and 
8 pie, taking the standard rupee to have weighed 176 grains^. From 
an analysis of the weights of the 97 circular rupees, I find more than 
half (54) range between 175 and 177 grains, the lowest weight (1) is 
166‘5 and the highest (4) is 187 grains. These latter coins come from 
the Katak and Murshidabad mints, and are probably a local variation. 
The diameters range from *80 of an inch to IT inch; there are 60 of 
'85, 34 of '90, 11 of ’95 and 9 of 1*0. Judging from the above facts, 
it is probable that the standard rupee was 176 grains in weight, and 
90 of an inch in diameter. 
From a farmdn dated the 5th Rabl‘ I. of the 4th year, we obtain 
the following details as to Farrukhsiyar’s seals. There were two ; the 
first one was round, with a diameter of 4f inches, the second square, 
§ inches each way. 
i 
