Page 21, Ulrich notebook No. 24. 
Sketches illustrating deductions on p. 19 . 
Sept. 12, 1915, 
At— 
Bedford 
Doan Brook 
Typical Cleveland shale^r 
*1 / 
»«. <•-'4 H 
% \ 
< ^ 
>e s '; 
■V. 
8 ‘'«as\i l y"«* lnor 3i 
< s *rr-~-atiors 
\—*L •V ^ 1 1 
^86j 
/-i < ' / 
< ' j 
-- Qz*^'/ ’ < 
contact grows more and more inconspictious 
westward. Both receive sand from same source 
and the Ohio got little of its sand from 
erosion of Chagrin. 
sh 
or® 
m 
s>: - > 
^ - ■- _ , *»*««» 
;robaole condition in vicinity (to southeast) 
of Huron river at Milan. 
Berea escarpment 
Berea 
-Bedford 
Cleveland 
i 
o 
p 
H- 
< 
0> 
h°'° 
foncaaia 
(r 
SE 
Huron 
, uirich notebook Ho. 24. ’* 
Sept. 10, 1915. 
Beech Parle, 0. Section made by T^ydo. 
£t 1 SS« 
r * —'• 
mrr • w -***rr~ 
■ISW.105-.; 1 ? 1 
^- 1 
afcale above Ub 6" es 
<s 
_ >p _ 
—. •.'... -f y.i 
^ _ __ 
'nods and rich ss. as in Porter Creek & Goetz’s 
x t® break lies from 27 to 29 inches beneath the lower of 
two layers of sandstone, each 2-5 incaes thick and less than 
a foot apart. 
at Coetz*s tly quit ® as 1311021 sandstone here in the Chagrin as 
/ 1 «„.* Contac ' t raarlred by a thin but varying thickness of easily 
decomposing clay snale carrying minute globules of pvrite. ‘ 
thnhSh +?^S, Ct cut ! und ? r lying Chagrin sedimentation planes 
throu^i tnickness of an inch or so in distance of 4 to 6 ft. 
lens e s \e r e°Inri W t w «^5J li teri 2 n l /as tested. Sandstone 
lenses here ana there beneath contact may accentuate the 
snsi-sia 5i&°gsihb5si sn ^ffcSsiisgoSr 0801 **" 
