FOREST AND STREAM 
179 
REMINGTON 
UMC 
Why Do Speed Shell Shooters 
Win Oftenest At The Traps? 
Would you like to know why shooters of Remington-UMC Arrow and 
Nitro Club Steel Lined Speed Shells have a better chance to break targets ? 
Would you like to know why the shot charges from Arrow and Nitro Club 
Shells get to the targets quicker? Why shooters of these shells do not have to 
hold so far ahead of birds ? Why they can come nearer to point blank shooting ? 
A Post Card will bring to you a copy of “Inside Shot Shell Fa c ts Laid Bare’’ 
--containing most interesting information that will suggest the way to better scores. 
WRITE TODAY! 
REMINGTON ARMS-UNION METALLIC CARTRIDGE CO. 
299 Broadway, NEW YORK 
STANDING OF CLUBS. 
Aggregate Matches Matche: 
Won. 
2 
2 
1 
2 
I 
I 
o 
I 
0 
Lost. 
i 
0 
0 
I 
o 
I 
1 
2 
Score 
Washington State ..1,951 
Michigan Agric.’.... 1,944 
Iowa State .1,933 
Mass. Agric.1,928 
West Virginia ....1,920 
Cornell .1,912 
'California .1,889 
U. S. N. Academy .1,887 
Illinois .1,883 
Norwich .1,875 
Minnesota .1,864 
Purdue .1,836 
Match No. 4. Week Ending February 4, 1915. 
CLASS A 
Washington State College, 981, vs. University of Mil 
nesota, 952; Michigan Agricultural Mechanical Colleg 
980, vs. West Virginia University, 971; Cornell Un 
vers ity,972, vs. Massachusetts Agricultural College, 96, 
Iowa State University, 972, vs. Norwich University, 93. 
U. S. Naval Academy, «i, vs. University of Illinoi 
9451 University of California, 941, vs. Purdue Un 
versify, 928. 
CLASS A. 
STANDING OF CLUBS. 
Aggregate Matches Match. 
Per Cent. 
•97 
•97 
•97 
.96 
.96 
.96 
•94 
•94 
•94 
■94 
•93 
.92 
Lost. 
1 
0 
1 
Score 
Washington State ..3,916 
Michigan Agric. ..3,895 
Iowa State .3,868 
Mass. Agric.3,862 
Cornell .3,848 
West Virginia ....3,845 
U. S. N. Academy .3,786 
California .3,768 
Minnesota .3,768 
Illinois .3,765 
Norwich .3,752 
Purdue .3,689 
CLASS B, MATCH NO. 2. 
University of Pennsylvania, 942, vs. Dartmouth Cc 
* e ge, 891; North, Georgia Agricultural College, 91 
vs. Oklahoma Agricultural and Mechanical College, 87 
University of Vermont, 931, vs. Notre Dame Universit 
913; Worcester Polytechnic Institute, 915, vs. Unive 
sity of Wisconsin, 872; University of Maine, 922, v 
Princeton University, 895. 
STANDING OF CLUBS. 
Aggregate Matches Match. 
Per Cent. Won. Lost 
95 2 o 
93 2 o 
Per Cent. 
.98 
•97 
■97 
96 
96 
96 
95 
94 
94 
94 
94 
92 
Won. 
3 
4 
3 
2 
Score 
University of Pa...1,899 
University of Me. .1,857 
University of Va. .1,854 
Wor. Poly. Inst. ..1,852 
Notre Dame .1,839 
No. Georgia Agric.. 1,835 
Dartmouth .1,793 
Princeton .i,777 
Oklahoma Agricul¬ 
tural & Mech.1,764 
Univ. of Wis.1,729 
CLASS C, MATCH NO. 2. 
University of Michigan, 902, vs. University of Arizona, 
833; University of Washington, 814, vs. Lehigh Univer¬ 
sity, 807; Yale University, 927, vs. Kansas State Agri¬ 
cultural, College, 903; University of Nebraska, 906, vs. 
Mississippi Agricultural and Mechanical College, 822; 
Rhode Island State College, 827, vs. University of 
Idaho, 795. 
STANDING OF CLUBS. 
Aggregate 
Score 
Matches Matches 
Per Cent. Won. Lost. 
Yale University ..1,816 
.91 
2 
0 
Univ. of Neb.1,807 
.90 
2 
0 
Kansas State Agric.. 1,783 
.89 
1 
I 
Univ. of Mich.1,763 
.88 
2 
0 
Univ. of Arizona... 1,704 
■85 
0 
2 
Mississippi Agri¬ 
cultural & Mech.. 1,621 
.81 
1 
I 
Rhode Island State. 1,618 
.81 
1 
I 
Univ. of Wash. ..1,593 
.80 
1 
I 
Univ. of Idaho ....1,521 
.76 
0 
2 
Lehigh . 807 
.40 
0 
2 
Match No. 5. Week 
Ending 
February 11, 
1915- 
CLASS A. 
Washington State College, 986, vs. West Virginia 
University, 973; Michigan Agricultural Mechanical Col¬ 
lege, 970, vs. University of California, 939; Cornell 
University, 972, vs. University of Minnesota, 937; U. 
S. Naval Academy, 947, vs. Purdue LTniversity, 943; 
Iowa State University, 967, vs. University of Illinois, 
938; Massachusetts Agricultural College, 971, vs. Nor¬ 
wich University, 906. 
STANDING OF CLUBS. 
Aggregate Matches Matches 
Score 
Per Cent. 
Won. 
Lost. 
Washington State 
.4,902 
.98 
4 
I 
Michigan Agric. 
■4,865 
•97 
5 
0 
Iowa State . 
■4,835 
•97 
4 
I 
Mass. Agric. 
•4,833 
•97 
3 
2 
Cornell . 
.96 
3 
2 
West Virginia .. 
.4,818 
.96 
3 
2 
U. S. N. Academy 
•4,733 
•95 
3 
2 
California . 
■4,707 
•94 
3 
2 
Minnesota . 
•4,705 
•94 
1 
4 
Illinois . 
•4,703 
.94 
1 
4 
Norwich . 
.4,658 
•93 
0 
5 
Purdue . 
•93 
0 
5 
CLASS B, MATCH NO. 3. 
University of Pennsylvania, 950, vs. Notre Dame 
University, 933; University of Vermont, 946, vs. Okla¬ 
homa Agricultural and Mechanical College, 872; Uni¬ 
versity of Wisconsin, 912, vs. Dartmouth College, 911; 
Worcester Polytechnic Institute, 937, vs. University of 
Maine, 917; North Georgia Agricultural College, 953, 
vs. Princeton University, 882. 
STANDING OF CLUBS. 
Aggregate _ _ Matches Matches 
Score Per Cent. 
Univ. of Pa. ......2,849 -95 
Univ. of Va. .../..2,800 .93 
Wor. Poljr. Inst. ..2,789 .93 
No. Georgia Agric...2,788 .93 
Univ. of Me.2,774 -92 
Won. 
3 
3 
2 
2 
2 
Lost. 
0 
2 
1 
1 
1 
Notre Dame .2,772 .92 1 2 
Dartmouth .2,704 .90 0 3 
Princeton .2,659 .89 1 2 
Univ. of Wis.2,641 .88 ' 1 2 
Oklahoma Agricul¬ 
tural & Mech. ...2,636 .88 0 3 
CLASS C, MATCH NO. 3. 
University of Nebraska, 903, vs. University of Idaho, 
843; Mississippi Agricultural and Mechanical College, 
871, vs. Lehigh University 841; Yale University, 900; 
vs. Rhode Island State College, defaulted; University 
of Michigan, 904, vs. Kansas State Agricultural Col¬ 
lege, 896; University of Arizona, 869, vs. University 
of Washington, 839. 
STANDING OF CLUBS. 
Aggregate 
Matches 
Matches 
Score 
Per Cent. 
Won. 
Lost. 
Yale .2,716 
.90 
3 
0 
Nebraska .2,710 
.90 
3 
0 
Kansas State Agric..2.670 
.89 
1 
2 
Michigan .2,667 
.89 
3 
0 
Arizona .2,573 
Mississippi Agricul¬ 
tural & Mech.2,492 
.86 
1 
2 
• 83 
2 
I 
Washington .2,432 
.82 
1 
2 
Idaho .2,364 
•79 
0 
3 
Lehigh .1,648 
•55 
0 
3 
Rhode Island State .1,618 
•54 
1 
2 
NATIONAL INTER-CLUB GALLERY. 
Match No. 6. Week Ending January 28, 1915. 
CLASS A. 
Warren, Pennsylvania Rifle Club, 991, vs. Dickinson 
North Dakota Rifle Club, 979; The Park Club, Bridge¬ 
port, Conn., 988, vs. District of Columbia Rifle Associa¬ 
tion, 981; Boston, Massachusetts Rifle and Revolver Club, 
962, vs. Adrian, Michigan Rifle Club, 947; Engineers 
Rifle and Revolver Club, Cleveland, O., 994, vs. Still¬ 
water, Minnesota Rifle Club, 953; Peters Rifle and 
Revolver Club, Kings Mills, O., 995, vs. Birmingham, 
Alabama Athletic Club Rifle Association, 975; Bucyrus, 
Ohio Rifle Association, 988, vs. Manchester, New Hamp¬ 
shire Rifle and Pistol Club, 971. 
STANDING OF CLUBS. 
Engineers . 
Aggregate 
Score 
Per Cent. 
Matches 
Won. 
Matches 
Lost. 
.5,948 
•99 
6 
0 
Park Club .... 
.5,947 
•99 
5 
1 
Peters . 
•99 
4 
2 
Warren . 
.5,943 
•99 
6 
0 
Dist. of Col. .. 
.5,909 
.98 
4 
2 
Bucyrus . 
.5,908 
.98 
4 
2 
Birmingham .. 
.5,826 
•97 
4 
2 
Manchester ... 
.5,822 
•97 
I 
5 
Dickinson . 
.5,772 
.96 
1 
5 
Adrian . 
.5,698 
•95 
0 
6 
Stillwater . 
.5,692 
•95 
0 
6 
Boston . 
. 5 , 68 g 
CLASS 
■95 
B. 
1 
5 
Gisholt Rifle Club, Madison, Wis., 967, vs. Swiss Rifle 
Club, Louisville, Ky., 929; Hopkins, Minnesota Rifle 
Club, 957, vs. Milwaukee, Wisconsin Rifle and Pistol 
Club, 947; Youngstown, Ohio Rifle and Revolver Club, 
974, vs. Tacoma, Washington Rifle Club, 948; Marion, 
