l^tolJolienliron ^ocietp Botes; 
you may care to read the enclosed translation of a paper by Suringar, 
published in Gartenflora, in 1908, in which he discusses the questions 
of their difference, their prevalence in cultivation and their nomenclature. 
I should take it that the R. japonicum sent by Professor Sargent last year 
is the R. JAPONICUM of Suringar, i.e., the true R. molle, but a glance at the leaf 
taking the characters given in Plantae Wilsonianae, and by Suringar in his paper 
will tell you at once whether it is R. molle or R. sinense.” 
Sir Edmund Loder tells me that Professor Balfour has examined his plant of 
nigropunctatum, and is of the opinion that it is not the true species. (See also 
Rhod. Soc. Notes, Vol. I., p. 149.) 
The thanks of the Society are due to Sir Edmund Loder for the trouble taken 
to get out this list. 
C. C. E 
adenogynum 
adenopodum 
*£eruginosum 
albiflorum 
*Albrechtii 
ambiguum 
Amesiae 
amoenum 
Anthopogon 
anthosphaerum 
apodectum 
arborescens 
farboreum 
arboreum “ Sir Charles Lemon ” 
farboreum album 
[syn. cinnamoneum) 
arboreum var. Kermisinum 
(blood red) 
argenteum {syn. grande) 
*argyrophyllum var. cupulare 
Augustinii 
auriculatum 
austrinum 
jBaileyi 
barbatum 
*charianthum 
Boothii (tender) 
brachycarpum 
bracteatum 
Brettii 
{syn. longesquamatum) 
buUatum (tender) 
calendulaceum 
califomicum 
calophyllum 
calophyllum var. tubiflorum 
calophyllum var. virginale 
calophytum 
campanulatum 
*camelhaeflorum 
campylocaipum 
campylogjmum 
candidum 
carolinianum 
catawbiense 
caucasicum 
cephalanthoides microforme 
cephalanthum 
*Chamcecistus 
{syn. for Rhodothamnus 
Chamcccistus) 
JFortunei Spooneri 
* Not in the Caerhays List, Rhod. Soc. Notes, Vol. I., p. 132. C.C.E. 
t See Introductory Note, pp. 197, 198. 
t See Note upon the Fortune! group, pp. 187-193. C.C.E. 
198 
