8 
S. EITREM. 
|No. 3 
V. 303 Aaxa Aa/aco Aax-Laou — then the last three syllables 
are repeated, but in the opposite order: [xouxiAa; cp. also pap. Osl. 1, 
Verso 63 y.y.\ tgtotou avayx,7]g Xax.i Aa<('/.)L(x) Xay.ioj|u5| 
Aa'/.!,couSa. V. 302 /-al xaTa <(tojv itscov — or only twv — iizi'?') 
Tcov Tt,[xcop(.(x)v TSTayixévcav, cp. pap. Bibl. Nat. 1277 Auvaj-tiv . . . 
U770 /-uplou bsou T£Tay[jL£V7]V £7rl TW (i. e. TOu) CrTp£Cp£LV . . . TOV 
l£pov TToXov. V. 306 aXV a^ov Wessely correctly. V. 305 Pap. otl 
[JL'/] 7 :apa[j[.£LvaT£; the sentence is to be connected with 
rr£ V. 301 and should be corrected into otl pt-oi 7 Tapa[j(.£ivrjT£ (cp. 
pap. Bibl. Nat. 984 7 rapa[jL£t.v 6 v [xot åv tji apTi ojpa). V. 309: 
Pau$a is to be taken as ^aujo (i. e. ^au^ov), “bark like a dog”? 
as pap. Lond. XLVI 27 /-uvo/£(paAir 7 Tl, Pap. Leyd. W. 2 a 37 
/-UVO/-£CpaAt,'7TL — l£pa/.t,(7Tl? 
V. 310 £v Taupoj Kp£i.w [[^ Taupw]]. 
V. 312 the formula ordinarily runs thus axpa[jLp!.a)(_a[jLapt. 
cr£a£vy£v[iap — thereupon 91 is possible, but there is not suffi- 
cient room for Pap 9 apayy 7 j 5 ; 9 pa^aa)il is perhaps a corruption 
of the common 7 r£ 90 a 9 co^a. V. 313 a 7 ro Tracj*/]; £ 7 t 7 ]p£(ag; interesting 
is the quotation in Liddell-Scotfs Lex. s. v. Lue. Laps. 1 
£ 7 r'/]p£ia 5al;xov6g TLvog “his capricious dealing”, his insult. V. 314 
TravTtov a£picov probably is corrupted from TrvaTcov (Traube, No- 
mina saera 93 sqq.) i. e. 7 rv£u[xaTCjL)v a£plcov (åépiog = aépivoc also 
V. 893); or we have to supply jravTOJv <( 7 rv£U[xaTtov) a. V. 316 aypa- 
[xa/-pa[xap probably is a corruption of axpapLa;(a[xapL; the last 
word of the line is tac 7 co 7 r [3 • • £ 7 rvouT£o (vid. Wessely). V. 317 
ay_i)'!,co 9 i[[ 9 l] £p£cry(_iya7.: v£[ 3 ouTO(T/ouaA 7 ] 9 ' (Wess.) fraheoO' etc. (Ken. 
Wilck.). 
V. 322 i. e. [xot, £pt,7ro§l^7]Tat. zlg ttjv [xavTLav [xou vau- 
T'/jv [X'/] 9 (X)V 7 j etc. V. 324 vaov is a very curious interchange of 
syllables, viz. ov(&[x)a — then tov probably miswritten for vou. 
V. 336 xax£p[iaco ordinarily 7rax£pp>w. V. 332 : is crx£7LTO[X£vou tou 
7 rpay[xaTog ,,when you see the thing wanted”? V. 358 ;(p 7 ][xa- 
Tif7aT£ Tzspl ou c/wETTTOpLai, TTpayjxaTO^. The whole is an auTOTTvog 
(viz. Aoyog); then: ’ATroXucng' Xéjs’ 
V. 335 [ 3 ouX 7 ]|[i ;1 |. V. 387 TTTépov i^sojg SocztuIcjv t, 8 , i. e. the 
holy number 7 twice. V. 350 sqq. the reconstruetion of the 
epithetes is shown by Wessely by means of pap. Bibl. Nat. 
1345 sqq. 
V. 355 not (xvocY(''i)s 7 r 67 r-xg, most probably we have to 
correct åvayxejidxTaQ according to pap. Bibl. Nat. 1361. 
