130 JOURNAL OF THE PLYMOUTH INSTITUTION. 
the Rev. Walter Copleston Radcliffe, rector of Fonthill Gififord, son 
and heir of the Rev. Walter Radcliffe, of Warleigh. The arms of 
Radcliffe are incorrectly painted ; they should he, Arg. a bend eng. 
sa., on a canton of the first a horse's head couped of the second. 
1881. Mrs Wilson, Sa. a wolf salient or, on a chief of the last 
a pale of the first betw. two pellets, and charged with a fieur-de-lis 
arg. : imp. Arg. a chev. betw. three billets gu. This lady was 
Mary, daughter of Arthur Kelly, Esq., of Kelly, and married, 
15th Feb., 1860, Joseph Edward Maitland Wilson, Esq., Captain 
(then Lieutenant), r.n., third son of Henry Wilson, Esq., of 
Stowlangtoft Hall, co. Suffolk. The coat of Wilson ought to have 
a mullet as the difference of a third son. 
1882. Lady Francis Cecil. There are no arms given, only the 
crest; viz.; that of the Marquis of Exeter, with a crescent on the 
garb, for difference. For the wife of Lord Francis Horace Cecil, 
second son of the third Marquis of Exeter, and daughter of W. 
Cunliffe Brooks, Esq., m.p. 
1883. Mrs. Bradshaw. The shield put up to commemorate this 
lady is altogether wrong. It is, Quarterly : 1 and 4- Bradshaw right ; 
2 and 3 Arg. an eagle displ. sa., in chief a crescent or. It should 
be: Gu. two bends or; Bradshaw: imp. Sa. on a cross arg., 
quarterly, pierced of the field four eagles displayed of the first, in 
the first quarter a crescent or, for difference ; Buller. Being for 
Emmeline, daughter of the Rev. Richard Buller, Rector of Lan- 
reath, married, 19th May, 1858, to Frank Bradshaw, of Lifton 
Park, co. Devon, Esq. 
1884. Mrs. Henry Clark. This shield, like the one last men- 
tioned, is so very incorrect that we will not blazon the coats as they 
stand. The shield is made quarterly of four : 1 Clark, of Efiford 
Manor ; 2 Phillips ; 3 Treby ; 4 Carpenter. The three last coats 
are incorrectly drawn. It is difficult, without a drawing, to make 
the errors of this shield quite plain to those who do not under- 
stand heraldic laws. The coats are arranged to represent an 
unmarried person, though the coats in the second and fourth 
quarters really belong to Mrs. Clark's family ; but they are in- 
correctly drawn, and improperly marshalled. In the coat of 
Phillips a fancy scroll is introduced in place of the bordure 
