
          In 1922 sample was received as
Acc. No. 3034.  C: 17-18 : 4 labeled Boiken
Records show no. 3034 C: 17-18 : 5 is [illegible]
In 1923 & 1924 and 1925 specimens came
in from Arlington Farm marked Barr[y]
No immediately available record now on which
to settle the confusion.  In each of these
3 years fruit was considered as Boik[en]
but inadequate information now
to whether actual comparisons with
authentic Boiken were made.
Likely tree No. 4 in 1922 was a mistake
and should have been 5.  Even if the loca[tion]
given was Boiken, the Acc. No. appare[ntly]
belonged to Barry, Doubtful, howev[er]
if this was the Barry. Acc. No. 1905. A: 3-4 [illegible]
        